Is the Bible CLEAR on This Issue?
Lorraine Day, M.D.
Numerous books on the subject of homosexuality have been written by theologians, Bible scholars, and other Christians purporting to tell us what God says about the issue of homosexuality. But the majority of their information is gained from human sources psychologists, psychiatrists, “scientists” studying human sexuality, and other academics, rather than from the Bible. And the conclusions they reach are usually middle-of-the-road, straddle-the-fence, “let’s please both sides” conclusions that are often watered-down majority opinions, or at least conclusions that make the “Church,” it’s clergy and its members more comfortable dealing with the issue, irrespective of its lack of Biblical basis.
As the apostle Paul said, they are
“Ever learning, but never able to come to the knowledge of the TRUTH.”
2 Timothy 3:7
They are depending on “Sense Knowledge,” knowledge that is obtained through their five senses (sight, hearing, taste, touch, smell), without the need for any spiritual discernment. “Revelation knowledge” is obtained spiritually by knowing God, having a true personal relationship with Jesus Christ, who then opens one’s eyes and mind to see and understand the truth in the Bible.
The Bible tells us in 1 Corinthians 2:14:
The natural (soulish or unspiritual) man does NOT receive (understand) the things of the Spirit of God (Spiritual things): for they are foolishness unto him; neither can he know (understand) them, because they (spiritual things) are spiritually discerned.
Unless God opens the eyes of the Bible seeker so he can see truth, he will continue to walk in darkness, no matter how much he studies.
This debate and discussion by the clergy and scholars of the Christian Church is highly reminiscent of the constant debating of minutiae by the Scribes and Pharisees of Jesus time, a Pharisaical characteristic that the people could easily perceive. They said of Jesus, “He speaks as One with authority, and NOT as the scribes.” (Mark 1:22) They were saying in essence, “Jesus KNOWS what He is talking about. He is not indecisive, quibbling or hesitant and He does not debate inanities as the scribes and Pharisees do. He speaks with authority.”
Nothing has changed in the religious sphere. The present-day theologians and Bible scholars are continuing the “dance” of the Pharisees and scribes of old by covering all sides of the issue, saying everything - - - yet saying nothing! Their conclusions are “mushy” at best.
In order to find out what God says, we must go to His Word. Furthermore, we must “rightly divide” the word of Truth and that can only happen if we have God’s spirit in us. We see God through our OWN character, and not through His. Only when He has put His character in us can we see what He is really like. We must use “Revelation knowledge” rather than “Sense knowledge.”
Let’s begin with a review of some of God’s characteristics:
God loves EVERYONE the same. He is NO respecter of persons. (Acts 10:34)
God does NOT throw anything away, not even scraps of bread after Jesus fed the multitude. (Matthew 14:20)
God’s Creation originally was Perfect. God “stopped and rested” on the Seventh-day Sabbath after He created the world because there was NO MORE to do. It was Perfect. (Genesis 2:2)
God will make us Perfect once again. “You SHALL be perfect!” (Incorrectly translated “Be ye Perfect.”) Matthew 5:48
God makes us Perfect through TROUBLE, NOT by waving a magic wand after we are dead, (Romans 5:3,4) therefore
God will make us Perfect on this earth PRIOR to heaven or the New Earth.
God will save ALL (He is the Saviour of ALL Mankind 1 Timothy 4:10) but not IN their sins, only FROM their sins. (Man REAPS what he SOWS.) Galatians 6:7
God does NOT start something that He can’t finish! (Does a man build a tower without first considering the cost?) Luke 14:28
There are approximately 25 texts in the Bible that tell us that God will only SAVE a small number of all those who have ever been created. These include, “Many are called; few are chosen” (Matthew 22:14) Wide is the way that leads to destruction, but narrow is the way that leads to life eternal (Matthew 7:14), God has a little flock (Luke 12:32) etc.
But there are OVER 100 texts in the Bible that say that God is going to save EVERYONE! Just a few of these are given here:
1. there shall be “a restitution of ALL things. . .” Acts 3:21
2. All creation, which now groans, shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.” Rom 8:19-23
3. God was in Christ reconciling the world unto Himself.” 2 Cor 5:19
4. God is the Saviour of ALL men. . . 1 Tim 4:10
5. Behold, I create ALL new.
6. Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world.
An honest student of the Bible cannot embrace one side and disregard all the texts on the other side. So how do we interpret the Bible to be able to include all the texts on both sides in our understanding? That is discussed thoroughly in the study entitled, “What Happens at the Judgment? Is God a ‘Killer’ God?” (See www.goodnewsaboutgod.com)
God WILL Restore His Creation His ENTIRE Creation!
“For the (entire) Creation (NOT “creature”) was made subject to vanity (futility sin), NOT willingly, but by reason of Him who has subjected it, in hope (expectation).
For the (entire) Creation (Not “creature”) also SHALL BE DELIVERED from the bondage of corruption (sin) into the glorious liberty of the children of God. Romans 8:20,21
God subjected the world to sin. It was God’s idea. It is the job of the Adversary, Satan, to accomplish this.
God said, “I created the waster to destroy.” Isaiah 54:16
God will change and save His ENTIRE Creation, including ALL mankind!
But God will NOT save us IN our sins, only FROM our sins. We must be changed into HIS image.
So now we know for SURE that NO ONE is hopelessly lost!
Do Homosexuals “Choose” their Lifestyle?
Homosexuality is, in almost all cases, NOT a “choice.” But neither is it genetic! The color of one’s skin is determined by his genes. The color of one’s eyes is determined by his genes. Whether or not a person is male or female is determined by his or her genes. These characteristics are genetic. These characteristics cannot be changed. Even if one has a sex change operation, for example removal of the male genitalia with the surgical formation of a replica of female genitalia - even with the addition of female hormones taken by the person, his genes are still MALE genes. These characteristics are genetic. Genetic characteristics cannot be changed.
However, lifestyle factors CAN be changed. There are numerous well-documented cases of homosexuals changing PERMANENTLY to the heterosexual lifestyle.
Even though the homosexual did not “choose” his lifestyle, neither does a baby of a drug addicted mother “choose” to be born a drug addict. But when that baby grows up, he must “choose” to live life differently and overcome his addiction.
In the same way, the homosexual must “choose” to overcome his sexual addiction.
Of course, the homosexual community does not like to admit that homosexuals can change, and will, at every turn, ridicule that possibility. But nevertheless, it is true. Psychologist, Dr. Joseph Nicolosi, and many others have had major success in the Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality. (See his excellent book by the same name, published by Jason Aronson, Inc.)
Why Does the Homosexual Community Publicly Resist these Facts?
The Homosexual Community publicly resists these established facts, even though, privately, they admit them. The Homosexual Community not only resists the fact that hundreds, even thousands, of homosexuals have changed their orientation to heterosexuality, but they belittle, ridicule, and aggressively attack all those, including members of their own homosexual community, who believe this.
Unfortunately, the entire Homosexual Community is being USED as unknowing, naïve pawns in a global chess game for control of the world AND extermination of most of the world’s population. The behind-the-scenes promoters of homosexuality are never in full view and their eventual goals are rarely, if ever, known by the members of the homosexual community. Little do they know that those at the top who are promoting and encouraging their homosexual lifestyle really want them dead!
Why, since the 1960’s, has there been an increasing acceptance and promotion of the homosexual lifestyle? Television and radio programs, together with newspaper and magazine articles have saturated our society with the promotion of homosexuality, demanding its acceptance as equal to or even better than the heterosexual lifestyle. But one must understand just who owns the media television, movies, newspapers and magazines it is the Zionist Jews!
Most homosexuals believe that society is finally becoming progressively enlightened, but only because of the homosexual organizations’ collective and aggressive tactics. The homosexuals are often taught, and usually believe, that they are the victims of an unfair society particularly the Christian society because of the “Bible-thumping”, angry, self-righteous “Church” people who harangue them with God’s Word, telling them that they are “going to Hell.” Some so-called “Christians” have even called for their destruction all in the name of their “God” even though God says “Thou shalt NOT kill!” and “Love your enemies; do GOOD to those who hate you,” commands from a loving God that the “Christians” seem to forget.
The New World Order’s Homosexual Agenda
The New World Order a One World Government is fast approaching. By 2010, the North American Community will be a reality, the combining of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico as ONE country. (See www.goodnewsaboutgod.com) This is the SECOND kingdom of the One World Government. The First kingdom is the European Union. Soon, the entire world will be melded into Ten Kingdoms for complete control by the International Bankers and their associated elitists.
One main goal of the New World Order is a massive decrease in the world’s population, from the present 6 billion down to 500 million a drop of 5 1/2 billion people, by the year 2020. Why? They want the world and all its resources for themselves. They want all the money, all the land, and all the resources for themselves. A small number of others will be allowed to live as their slaves or administrators all others will be killed. (See “Population Control” at www.goodnewsaboutgod.com)
How will the New World Order accomplish this mass extermination of the majority of the earth’s population? By two main methods:
(1) KILLING of the present population with wars in almost every country, with contagious diseases, vaccinations they CAUSE disease, epidemics (AIDS, tuberculosis, Bird Flu they are trying very hard at this one), euthanasia, abortion, infanticide (soon to come to America), Cancer, heart disease and many other diseases, which ALL have natural cures they won’t tell you about (see www.drday.com), yet Orthodox Medicine KILLS with their deadly “treatment” with chemotherapy, radiation, and other expensive drugs, and with hospice to make sure sick people actually DIE. AND by
(2) PREVENTING the birth of new babies, by abortion, by the promotion of HOMOSEXUALITY, birth control (that has also been shown to cause breast and uterine cancer another form of population extermination), and the promotion of promiscuity that causes venereal diseases that can lead to infertility in women, AND the destruction of the family.
The January 10,1963, Congressional Record contains the list of 45 goals of the Communist Party (The origin of Communism is the Jewish Talmud the HOLIEST book of Judaism, according to the most revered Jewish rabbis). So the Communist Goals are the GOALS of the Zionist Jews:
Here are numbers 24-26 on homosexuality, obscenity, promiscuity and degeneracy:
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
Here are numbers 40 and 41 on the destruction of the family
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
Who is Behind the New World Order? Who is the Beast Power?
The New World Order is the Plan of the Zionist Jews to rule the world. It has been in effect since Nimrod tried to build the tower of Babel, but has received new impetus throughout the thousands of years since that time, and most recently with the formulation of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a Jewish document that details their diabolic plans for takeover of the world!
The Council on Foreign Relations in the U.S. is the Illuminati in America, the group that “advises” the government on foreign policy. Seventy-three percent of its members are Jewish.
The deceptively named Neo-Conservatives, including Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Dov Zakheim, Elliot Abrams, and many others, are ALL Jewish and control the President AND the presidency from behind the scenes.
In other words, they are the INVISIBLE Government that runs EVERYTHING and CONTROLS (by financial contributions) virtually the ENTIRE House of Representatives, the Senate, the Administration, and the Supreme Court.
Who Controls the Homosexual Agenda?
Thursday, May 24, 2007
The Radical Homosexual Movement Is Run By Jews
Here is an exhaustive list proving, once and for all, that the radical homosexual movement in the United States is a Jewish movement. Jews created it and run it from top to bottom. They are pushing the perversion and degeneracy that is spreading disease, sin and sickness through America like a wildfire.
THE FOLLOWING ARE ALL JEWS!
Larry Kramer -- co-founder of "Act Up," a homosexual/AIDS activist organization; co-founder of the Gay Men's Health Crisis
Alan Klein -- co-founder of group ACT UP, co-founder of group Queer Nation, National Communications Director and chief spokesperson for the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD]. Klein also co-founded the successful multimedia campaign STOPDRLAURA.COM
Arnie Kantrowitz -- co-founder of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].
Jonathan D. Katz -- founded and chairs the Harvey Milk Institute, the largest queer studies institute in the world. A long time queer political activist, was a co-founder of Queer Nation, [the key San Francisco branch].
Harvey Fierstein -- film actor [Mrs. Doubtfire]; well-known gay activist.
Moisés Kaufman -- playwright and film director [The Laramie Project].
Israel Fishman -- founder of the Gay Liberation Caucus in 1970 [now known as the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered Round Table of the American Library Association], the world's first gay professional organization.
Bella Abzug and Edward Koch -- both Jewish -- the first members of the U.S. House of Representatives to introduce legislation banning discrimination based on sexual orientation .
Winnie Stachelberg -- political director, Human Rights Campaign [HRC]
Michael S. Aronowitz, The New York Log Cabin Republicans.
Tony Kushner -- gay activist; Tony and 1993 Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright [for Angels in America, 1992].
Len Hirsch -- president of the GLBT federal government employees group, GLOBE.
Meg Moritz, Ph.D. -- a Director and member of the Executive Committee of GLAAD. Barbara Raab -- an NBC-TV producer; a "Jewish lesbian feminist journalist, writer."
Charles Kaiser [?] -- author & founding member of National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association [NLGJA].
David Goodstein -- owner/publisher of the gay magazine The Advocate [1975-1985]; co-founder of the National Gay Rights Lobby.
Judy Wieder -- Editor-in-chief, The Advocate gay magazine.
Alison Bechdel [?] -- cartoonist creator and author of the bi-weekly comic strip "Dykes to Watch Out For."
Kevin Koffler -- Editor-in-chief, Genre gay magazine.
Garrett Glaser -- National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association [NLGJA] national board member.
Ronald Gold -- reporter for Variety; a leader in the fight to overturn the American Psychiatric Association's policy that homosexuality is an illness.
Magnus Hirschfeld [d. 1935], early gay rights activist in Germany; founded one of the first gay rights organizations, the Scientific Humanitarian Committee; coined the term "transvestism"; fled Nazi Germany.
Fred Hochberg -- deputy administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration; co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign [HRC].
Michael Berman -- member, Human Rights Campaign Board of Directors.
Mitchell Gold -- HRC Board
Marty Lieberman -- HRC Board
Andy Linsky -- HRC Board
Dana Perlman -- HRC Board
Abby Rubenfeld -- HRC Board
Andrew Tobias -- HRC Board
Lara Schwartz -- Senior Counsel, HRC Heather Wellman -- HRC Field Coordinator
Dan Furmansky -- HRC Senior Field Organizer, West
Sally Green -- HRC Associate Field Director
Rick Rosendall [?] -- President, Gay & Lesbian Activists Alliance of Washington, DC.
Barney Frank -- member of U.S. Congress; helped create non-discriminatory employment policies in all U.S. federal agencies
Kerry Lobel -- executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.
in Margolis, American coordinator of the Bi Women's Cultural Alliance and author [Bisexuality: A Practical Guide].
Evan Wolfson, Senior Staff Attorney, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund -- and -- the executive director of Freedom to Marry.
Jennifer Einhorn -- Communications Director, Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD]
Nancy Alpert [?] -- Treasurer, GLAAD
Judy Gluckstern -- Board of Directors, GLAAD.
Stephen M. Jacoby -- Board of Directors, GLAAD.
Matt Riklin -- Board, GLAAD
Carol Rosenfeld -- Board, GLAAD.
William Weinberger -- Board, GLAAD
Tanya Wexler -- Board, GLAAD.
David Huebner -- GLAAD Counsel.
Richard Goldstein -- Village Voice writer on gay culture and politics
Ron Schlittler -- Director of Field & Policy, Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays [PFLAG].
Craig Ziskin -- Deputy Director of Development, PFLAG. Debra Weill -- Senior Field & Policy Coordinator, PFLAG.
Dody Goldstein -- Board of Directors, PFLAG.
David Horowitz -- Board of Directors, PFLAG.
Shawn Frank -- Board of Directors, PFLAG.
Leon Weinstein -- Chair, Nominating Committee, PFLAG.
Kate Kendell [?], National Center for Lesbian Rights.
Gayle Rubin -- lesbian author/activist.
Hilary Rosen -- a founding member of the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund; former board co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign.
Roz Richter, American attorney and activist.
Bob Kunst -- long-time activist in gay and Jewish causes. "Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network" [GLSEN].
Board co-chairs: Marty Seldman, president "National Gay & Lesbian Task Force" [NGLTF].
Board co-chairs: ..... Rachel Rosen in Santa Fe, N.M
Dave Fleischer -- Director of Training [political training], NGLTF.
Craig Hoffman -- Board of Directors, NGLTF.
Beth Zemsky -- Board, NGLTF.
Marsha C. Botzer -- Treasurer, NGLTF.
Jeff Levi -- first, Levi was NGTF's lobbyist, early 1980s [NGTF became NGLTF in 1985]. Later, he was NGLTF executive director.
Bill Rubenstein, J.D. '86, developed the ACLU Lesbian and Gay Rights Project
Martin Duberman -- author/historian; founded the Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies at the City University of New York.
Ben Schatz '81, J.D. '85, is executive director of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Foundation.
Kevin Schaub, American; Executive Director and Dean of the Harvey Milk Institute in San Francisco, the world's largest center for queer studies.
Sarah Schulman [1958- ], American playwright, novelist, and activist [one of the founders of the Lesbian Avengers, a direct-action lesbian rights organization].
Susan Spielman -- principal/head of Common Ground, an education/consulting firm specializing in workplace sexual orientation education; her company has worked with hundreds of U.S. organizations, helping them to implement domestic partner benefits plans; co-author of the book Straight Talk About Gays in the Workplace.
Gertrude Stein -- wrote the first openly lesbian novel, "Q.E.D.," in 1903, but it was only published posthumously in 1950.
Rikki Streicher (1925-1994), American activist and businesswoman.
Michael Goff -- founded Out magazine in 1992.
Paulette Goodman -- founder of local chapter [Washington D.C.] of PFLAG and served as President of the National PFLAG organization from 1988-1992.
Jeffrey Newman, American, president and COO of the Gay Financial Network; president and CEO of out.com.
Jim Levin -- New York gay historian.
Barrett Brick -- GLAA [Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance] Treasurer.
Robin Tyler -- American comedian [born Arlene Chernick] who was the first openly gay comic in North America; Tyler is also an activist who was the stage producer for the first three gay marches on Washington and the national protest coordinator for the "Stop Dr. Laura" campaign; she produces women's comedy and music festivals, and operates a lesbian travel-tour company.
Dr. Bruce Voeller [1935?-1994] [?] American gay rights activist, molecular biologist, physiologist, and AIDS researcher (pioneer in the use of nonoxynol-9 as a spermicide); cofounder and first executive director of the National Gay Task Force; creator of the Mariposa Foundation [an AIDS prevention research organization].
Mark Elderkin [?] -- co-founded Gay.com.
Leroy Aarons -- American professor, journalist, and founder of the National Gay and Lesbian Journalists Association (1990).
Dr. Donald I. Abrams -- American physician, HIV expert, medical marijuana researcher, and past president of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association.
Johnny Abush (1952-2000) -- [Canadian]; archivist of the International Jewish GBLT Archives.
Roberta Achtenberg [1950- ]; civil rights lawyer and federal official; appointed as Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity by President Bill Clinton in 1993.
Miriam Ben-Shalom [1948- ], American Army Reserves drill sergeant and gay activist; in 1986 she won a ten-year legal battle with the Reserves when a court ordered her reinstatement; founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Veterans Association [GLBVA] in 1990, serving as its first president.
Larry Brinkin, American gay activist who brought the first domestic partnership lawsuit [against Southern Pacific Railroad, 1982].
Rob Eichberg, American psychologist, co-creator of National Coming Out Day [October 11th].
Scott Evertz, American; in April 2001, President Bush appointed him to serve as the Director of the White House Office of National AIDS Policy [ONAP].
Gene Falk [?, Jewish name], American business executive; Senior Vice President of the Showtime Digital Media Group; part of the team that launched and marketed the U.S. TV series Queer as Folk; Chair of the Board of Directors of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].
Surina Kahn -- American lesbian activist.
Larry Kessler -- founding director in 1983 of the AIDS Action Committee of Massachusetts, the largest AIDS support organization in New England.
Kathy Levinson -- American investor and philanthropist; serves on the board of PlanetOut; also on NGLTF Board of Directors.
Judith Light -- actress, activist for gay causes.
David Mixner -- gay activist, political consultant; co-founder of the Municipal Elections Committee of Los Angeles [MECLA], a group of wealthy gays and lesbians who became influential in local politics; president Bill Clinton's Special Liaison to the Gay-Lesbian Community.
Dan Savage -- American author of gay-themed books [The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant; Skipping Towards Gomorrah: The Seven Deadly Sins and the Pursuit of Happiness in America] and gay-themed- sex-advice columnist [Savage Love].
Susan Schuman, American executive vice-president and general manager of the Planet Out gay and lesbian online service.
Scott Seomin, American entertainment media coordinator for the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].
Jason Serinus [Jay Guy Nassberg] -- founder and coordinator of the Lavender Healing Network; a former gay activist with the New York chapter of the Gay Liberation Front.
David Sine [?] -- American CEO of C1TV, the first U.S. gay and lesbian cable TV network.
Rex Wockner -- longtime gay, American journalist who has reported news for the gay press since 1985.
Jack Fritscher -- became Editor in Chief of Drummer gay magazine . Leslie Feinberg [1949- ], American trade unionist, transgender activist and author [Transgender Warriors: Making History from Joan of Arc to RuPaul].
Allan Ginsburg - late Jewish poet and leading member of North American Man Boy Love Association
Posted by The West on 5/24/2007
Destruction of the Family
The Jews are also leading the movement to destroy the family. The Feminist Movement was begun by Betty Frieden (Jewish), author of The Feminine Mystique, Lawyer, Congresswoman, and Feminist Activist Bella Abzug (Jewish), Feminist Activist and Editor of Ms. Magazine, Gloria Steinem (Jewish).
The primary Abortion mill in America, Planned Parenthood, was founded by Margaret Sanger (Jewish).
Homosexuality is NOT a “Choice”
therefore it is NOT the individual’s fault!
Homosexuals, particularly male homosexuals, know they are “different” from a very early age, frequently from as young 3 - 5 years old. For that reason, a few actually may believe they were born that way. But most homosexuals, when speaking privately will confirm a lack of bonding, at a very early age, with their father.
This “differentness” of the male homosexual is perceived by him mostly in non-sexual ways, as the child is very, very young long before puberty and the arrival of sexual urges. He often feels “different” because he is more comfortable with girls than with boys, often he is not particularly interested in male-type sports, he is often more artistic, aesthetic, and musical, and the musical instrument is often the piano, an instrument designed to be played alone. Frequently he is more attached to his mother than his male heterosexual siblings and other boys his age.
There are, however, a few cases, and unfortunately the number is increasing as society continues to deteriorate, in which the individual does “choose” homosexuality or bi-sexuality just to be trendy, or he is just seeking thrills. But in the vast majority of cases, homosexuality both male and female is NOT a “Choice.” It has been thrust upon them.
God purposely has made no perfect parents. ALL of us grow up with some sort of “baggage” but we must deal with that “baggage” as an adult. The past cannot be changed so we must grow in maturity, and as we do we must deal responsibly with the issue and move on, without blaming our parents or others who might have been involved.
We must learn to forgive those who may have been responsible, then deal, as a mature adult, with our own problems and overcome them.
What Causes Male Homosexuality?
In the psychoanalytic literature, male homosexuality has long been understood to be a reflection of gender-identity deficit. But because of society’s bombardment with a the propaganda of “Political Correctness” a concept developed and propagated by the Jews and the Jewish owned media (Newspapers, Television, magazines, and now increasingly radio) for sinister aims, the psychiatric profession has bowed to the Politics of the issue and has removed “Homosexuality” from the Psychiatric Disorder list and now discourages any treatment to change that behavior, even for those who WANT to change.
“Homosexualtiy is a developmental problem that is almost always the result of problems in family relations, particularly between father and son. As a result of failure with father, the boy does not fully internalize male gender identity, and develops homosexually. This is the most commonly seen clinical model. . .
“In the course of the child’s life, every significant developmental lesson has its critical period of receptivity. These periods of heightened awareness appear to have a biological basis. . . Receptivity to gender identity also has a critical period, after which the lesson will not be easily learned. Most researchers agree that the critical period for gender identification occurs before the third year (Greenacre 1957, Kohlberg 1966, LaTorre 1979, Moberly 1983, Money and Ehrhardt 1972, Socarides 1968, Stoller 1968). Within that period, the time of greatest receptivity appears to be the second half of the second year.”
“The child has some sense of the father from the very early months (Loewald 1951m Nagler et al, 1975), in fact, perhaps as early as 4 months of age (Abelin 1975). By 18 months he can differentiate pictures of boys and girls, men and women (LaTorre 1979). On a social level, he himself is increasingly being treated as a male. . . He gradually begins to view father as a self-like object. Now open and receptive to maleness, he will ‘exhibit a special interest in his father; he would like to grow like him and be like him. . .’ (Freud 1921, p 105)
“The boy does not yet understand that his emerging interest in father comes from a primal affinity based in their shared masculinity. Nor does he realize that father is the embodiment of what he himself is destined to be. Yet somehow there is a familiarity and a charismatic power.
“Now with the boy’s emerging sense of being like father, a dependency arises. He desires to be received and accepted by his father, and that fragile emerging masculine identity, receiving its only impetus from instinct, must be reflected in their relationship.
“Father needs to mirror and affirm the boy’s maleness. . . the boy seeks to take in what is exciting, fun, and energizing about his father. There is a freedom and power to outgrowing mother and this power is personified by the father.
“If father is warm and receptive, the boy will be encouraged to dis-identify from the feminine and enter into the masculine sphere. He will then become masculine-identified and most probably heterosexual.” Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality, J. Nicolosi, Ph.D., p 25-28
“There is clear evidence that boys with absent fathers are capable of heterosexual adjustment if they have not experienced emotional rejection from a significant male figure. . .For the primary cause of homosexuality is not the absence of a father figure, but the boy’s defensive detachment against male rejection. . . Every male has a healthy need for intimacy with other males. This desire emerges in early childhood and is satisfied first with the father, then later with male peers. When this drive is frustrated, homosexual attraction emerges as a ‘reparative striving’ (Moberly 1983, p ix). Ibid p 34.
“Homosexuality is an alienation from males in infancy from father, and in later life from male peers (because he is “different”). By eroticizing what he feels disenfranchised from, the homosexual man is still seeking this initiation into manhood through other males.” Ibid p 42
In one study of homosexual subjects who were NOT in psychotherapy, these subjects were more likely to perceive fathers as critical, cold, impatient, and detached. (Apperson and McAdoo 1968, Journal of Abnormal Psychology 73:201-206)
In a study of forty homosexual males, Brown reports not a single case in which a homosexual had an affectionate relationship with his father. (1963 Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society 115:304-311)
Rosen says, “For males, the presence of a good loving father during development is probably the best proof against homosexual development. . . I can think of no case (of homosexuality). . . where such a father has been present
In the early childhood years of development (1988- Hope for Homosexuals, et.
P. Fagan, pp 28-45. Washington, DC: Free Congress Research and Education Foundation p 21).
Socarides says, “Homosexuals consistently describe the father either as a weak, shadowy and distant figure or an angry, cold and brutalizing one” (1976 Male and Female: Christian Approaches to Sexuality, ed. R. Barnhouse and J. Holmes, p 145, New York: Seabury Press).
And Bieber states: “We have come to the conclusion that a constructive, supportive, warmly related father precludes the possibility of a homosexual son” (Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study of Male Homosexuals. New York: Basic Books, 1962 p 311).
In the majority of cases, male homosexuality is caused by a lack of bonding with the father, the father’s emotional and psychological “absence” because, even though present in the home, he spends very little time with his young son and does not “connect.”
A significant number of fathers leave the early rearing of the children, both girls and boys, to the mother. Only when the young boy is old enough, usually age 4 or 5 or older, to participate in things that the father enjoys baseball, football, swimming, sporting events, fishing, hunting, etc., does the father get involved. Unfortunately, homosexuality is usually “set” by the age of 3-5 precisely because of the child’s lack of bonding with his father.
Interestingly, homosexuality seems rarely to occur if the father is not present because he has died or is not present because of illness or some other appropriate reason. The child understands that he has not been rejected. So this feeling of rejection by the child appears to be a necessary component, along with the physical, or emotional and psychological absence of the father.
In a small number of cases, homosexuality may be the result of an excessively over-protective and controlling mother combined with a father who either may be too weak to object or who really wants to “connect” with his son, but in the interest of maintaining peace in the family, takes the easier road and allows the mother to take control. The outcome is the same. There is a lack of bonding with the father, and the son becomes a homosexual.
In other cases, the child has normally bonded with the father but is, at a later date, sexually molested by a man, possibly a relative or family friend. The child has been violated and humiliated and no longer feels worthy or comfortable to be in the heterosexual community or he may feel that no woman will be attracted to him.. He has also been exposed to the thrill-seeking, “exciting,” no-holds-barred debauchery of the homosexual community and becomes addicted.
Let’s Go Back to the Beginning When God Created Humanity
Genesis, Chapter 1 version of Creation
“So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them.” Genesis 1:27
“In the image of God created He him” (singular) means that there was just ONE person. God created ONE being Adam.
“Male and female created He them” tells us that God created the male and female in ONE body, then later God separated them into male and female beings. ALL the male AND the female characteristics come from God, so God created Adam (which literally means “mankind”) in His (God’s) image as ONE single being with both male and female characteristics.
Later, God separated them into two different beings. The “man” was given the “male” characteristics of God, and the “woman” was given the “female” characteristics of God. There was no place for ALL these characteristics to come from, other than from God, Himself.
Notice that the male and female are created simultaneously. And Genesis 1:26 reveals that God spoke them into existence.
Genesis, Chapter 2 version of Creation
The Genesis, Chapter 2, version of Creation expands on the Creation of humanity Adam and Eve given in Genesis 1:26. God gives us more information about HOW He performed the Creation.
In Genesis 2:7 we are told that “. . .the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.”
Notice that in Genesis, Chapter 2, the male and female are again created simultaneously in one body, and only later is Eve separated out from the body of Adam.
“And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and He (God) took one of his ribs (mistranslation should be “angular vault”), and closed up the flesh instead thereof; and the rib (angular vault), which the Lord God had taken from man, he built into a woman and brought her unto the man.” (KJV)
But the Concordant Literal Translation of Genesis 2:21,22 reads as follows:
“And falling is a stupor on the human, caused by Ieue Alueim, and he is sleeping. And taking is He one of his (Adam’s) angular organs and is closing the flesh under it. And Ieue Alueim is building the angular organ, which He takes from the human, into a woman, and bringing her is He (God) to the human (Adam).”
So, we find that, after all, in both versions of Creation, God created Adam and Eve at the same time, as ONE being. He created them as ONE individual, and then later, God separated them into two beings.
Did God Create Eve from Adam’s Rib?
The word translated “rib” is NOT “rib” but “angular organ” or more correctly, “angular chamber or vault.” This word is #6763 in Hebrew in Strong’s Concordance. That same word is used in texts in 1 Kings and in Ezra and in both cases is translated "chamber" or vault":
It is obvious that the word is NOT “rib” but “CHAMBER’ - a curved or vaulted chamber an angular vault.
God did NOT take a rib from Adam. God took the curved or angular “chamber” or “vault” the female reproductive organs - from Adam, and, after closing the flesh in that area, God formed Eve around the angular chamber/vault .
God first made humanity as one being, in God’s own image. Then God actually divided that being into two separate persons, one male and the other female. God took the female reproductive organs - the “angular chamber” from Adam and built Eve around them.
That’s why men and women have the SAME NUMBER of ribs, because God DID NOT take a rib from Adam to make Eve. God took from Adam what men DON’T have now, and what women DO have their female reproductive organs.Men still have nipples on their chest, and interestingly, they NEVER ask, “WHY?” The nipples are a vestige or remnant, and a reminder, of what Adam initially was, the single human being God created, from which God then separated out EVE! Nipples on men are a reminder that man and woman initially were created as One being One Flesh, the way God intends for man and woman to become in marriage - One Flesh.
That’s why Jesus, Himself, said in Matthew 19:4,5 when speaking to the Pharisees about divorce,
“Have you not read, that He which made them at the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE. And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall BE JOINED to his wife; and the TWO SHALL BE ONE FLESH? Wherefore, they are no longer two, but One Flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man take apart (put asunder).”
When a man and woman are married, according to Jesus, they are to be ONE
FLESH, just like God created man and woman in the beginning!
What Does Marriage Represent?
The marriage union between husband and wife male and female becoming ONE FLESH, represents GOD BECOMING ONE WITH US GOD BECOMING ONE WITH HUMANITY!
“Christ in you, the hope of glory.” Col; 1:27
“Let this mind be in you which is in Christ Jesus.” Phil 2:5
“My Father and I will come and make our abode with you.” John 14:29
“I died, yet I live, but not I, but Christ lives in me.” Gal 2:20
The husband, in the husband-wife relationship, represents or symbolizes God, whereas the wife symbolizes humanity. When the two become so intimate in mind, body and spirit, that they are “one flesh”, they symbolize God becoming one with us humanity!!
So, where do women get their female characteristics, personality and intuition? From God, of course. God made one human being in His own image, and then divided it in two, so men received the male characteristics of God and women receive the female characteristics of God. Everything comes from God.
Can Mankind Thwart the Laws of God and Have Perfect Peace?
God made male and female as ONE BEING, and later declared that the husband and wife should be as “one flesh.”
This is the foremost reason that homosexuality CANNOT ever be successful and CANNOT be condoned by God.
God is the Creator. He ALWAYS does things right. When man tries to change God’s Creation and God’s Plans, it can NEVER work! Because You CAN’T Improve on God!
Old Testament Laws on Homosexuality
Why did God, in the Old Testament, order those participating in homosexuality to be put to death?
Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is an abomination. Leviticus 18:22
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death. Leviticus 20:13
What Happened When the Israelites came to Sinai during the Exodus?
Passover, when the Israelites left Egypt in the Exodus, was on the 14th day of the First month (Abib) “in the evening.” (Exodus 13:4, Lev 23:5,6) Pentecost was fifty days later. (See texts below)
One month after the Israelites departed from Egypt and crossed the Red Sea, they went into the wilderness of Sin,
“. . .which is between Elim and Sinai, on the fifteenth day of the SECOND month after their departing out of the land of Egypt.” Exodus 16:1
In the THIRD month, after departing from Egypt, they came into the wilderness of Sinai.
“In the THIRD month, when the children of Israel were gone forth out of the land of Egypt, the same day came they into the wilderness of Sinai.” Exodus 19:1
The beginning of the “Third month” since departing from Egypt would be about
6 1/2 weeks after “the 14th day of the First month.’ Then God told Moses to tell the people to get ready and come to the foot of Mt. Sinai “in three days” for God to talk to them (where God would speak the Ten Commandments to them). This would be SEVEN weeks AFTER the Israelites left Egypt at the time of the Passover.
And the Lord said unto Moses, Go unto the people and sanctify (consecrate) them today and tomorrow, and let them wash their clothes, and be ready against the third day; for the third day the Lord will come down in the sight of all the people upon mount Sinai.” Exodus 19:10,11
Therefore, the Ten Commandments (found in Exodus 20:1-17) were spoken by God at Mt. Sinai on the day that would later be commemorated as Pentecost fifty days after Passover - the day that God put His Spirit into the disciples who were the true believers in Jesus Christ!
At that time, God wanted to put His law into the hearts of the Israelites in the wilderness, so they would do right because it IS right, rather than just obeying because they might get “punished” if they did not obey!
But the Israelites were afraid of God and wanted to have a human intermediary, Moses, between them (man) and God. They did not want to be ruled directly by God. They wanted to have a human go-between.
“And all the people saw the thunderings, and the lightnings and the noise of the trumpet, and the mountain smoking: and when the people saw it, they trembled, and stood afar off.
And they said unto Moses, ‘YOU speak with us, and we will hear: but do not let God speak with us, lest we die.” Exodus 20: 18,19
The people had chosen to rule over themselves man ruling over man rather than being ruled by God directly. God knew that if His law was NOT in their heart they would be unruly, out of control and in many cases, very wicked.
Therefore, since they would not let God rule over them directly and individually - God had to give them an extensive set of civil and criminal laws, (beginning in Exodus, Chapter 21 immediately after God spoke the Ten Commandments) some of them very harsh, so there would not be complete chaos and so the Israelites would understand with complete certainty that SIN leads to DEATH!
“He that smiteth his father, or his mother, shall be surely put to death.”
“He that kidnaps a man and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.” Ex 21:16
He that curseth his father, or his mother, shall surely be put to death.”
“An eye for an eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.” Ex 21:24,25
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death. Leviticus 20:13
The Israelites had just come out of 400 years of slavery. They were barbarians. Without God’s law in their heart, the Israelites would have to have strict laws to restrain them from injuring and killing one another. The penalties had to be harsh.
But if they had allowed God to put His law and His Spirit (His disposition) into their hearts directly, they would have no inclination to harm or cheat others or themselves and would not have needed those harsh laws to control their society.
But they were rebellious against God and wanted to rule over themselves.
Fifteen hundred years later, when Jesus was on earth teaching the gospel, He said to the people,
“You have heard that it has been said, ‘And eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. But I say unto you that you resist NOT an evil person; but whosoever shall strike you on your right cheek, turn to him the other also.
“Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them that spitefully use you and persecute you.” Matthew 5:38,39,44.
Interestingly, Jesus began by saying, ”You have heard that it has been said. . .” Well, of course they had heard it, God, Himself, had said it at Mt. Sinai. And since Jesus is God Jesus, Himself, had given these rules!
Why would He now change these rules? The answer is clear.
Once Jesus had come to earth to show mankind HOW to live, HOW to exhibit the character of Christ, HOW Jesus would put the law into their heart so they would DO RIGHT because it IS right, not for fear of punishment, THEN they would no longer need these harsh laws given in Exodus 21 and Leviticus 20. Their dispositions would be changed, they would have the “mind of Christ” and the Spirit of Christ the Spirit of Holiness instilled in them. By His life, death and resurrection, Jesus would do for His followers what the Israelites in the wilderness refused to allow God to do in their own hearts, fifteen centuries before.
But Aren’t New Testament Christians Free From the Old Testament Levitical Laws?
Chapters 18-20 of Leviticus deal with various laws and punishments. In Chapter 18, various sexual relationships are predominant: incest, adultery, and homosexuality, as well as child sacrifice and bestiality. Few Christians would be prepared to say that all of this is now acceptable because the early church was freed from the Levitical law, or that if it is done in loving relationship, it is not to be condemned.
In addition, the New Testament reiterates the negative attitude toward homosexual acts found in Leviticus but there is no command for physical destruction of the homosexual.
What does the New Testament Say About Homosexuality?
In the book of Romans, Paul deals specifically with the subject of Homosexuality and along with that he defines “God’s Wrath.” In Romans 1:18, Paul tells us that he will be speaking of God’s Wrath.
For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness. Romans 1:18
God’s wrath is NOT like man’s wrath. God does not “get mad” as man does. He tells us, “I’m NOT like you.” “My ways are higher than your ways and my thoughts are higher than your thoughts.” Isaiah 55:9
Then specifically in verses 24, 26, and 28 of Romans, Chapter 1, Paul DEFINES exactly what God’s wrath is. It is God giving us over to our OWN desires to REAP what we have SOWN.
God does NOT punish us for sinning. The word “punish” is not even in the Bible. It has been “written in” by the translators. The actual word is “visit.” Sometimes God “visits” us with good things and sometimes he “visits” us with bad things. But ALL our “visitations” are a direct result of our own decisions. We REAP what we have SOWN. We end up “punishing” ourselves by our wrong decisions.
We “visit” ourselves with the consequences of our acts.
Beginning in Romans 1:21:
21 Because that when they knew God, they glorified Him not as God, neither were thankful; but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.
23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, (“man” becomes his OWN god) and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. (Worship of Mother Earth Gaia Environmentalism)
When mankind refuses to acknowledge God as his Leader and chooses to make his own choices, demanding that he has the right to do so because man has “FREE WILL” (a totally UNbiblical concept), the result will be a slow death spiritually and physically as a result of embracing a life of homosexuality.
24 Whereas God also GAVE THEM UP to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: (Sexual Degeneracy)
25 Who exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshipped and served the creation (New Age earth worship, instead of worshiping God) rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.
26 For this cause God GAVE THEM UP unto vile affections; for even their women did exchange the natural use for that which is against nature: (Lesbianism)
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is shameful (Male Homosexuality) and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was due. (They will “receive in themselves” in their OWN bodies diseases such as AIDS, gay bowel syndrome, parasitic intestinal diseases, psychoses and neuroses). They will REAP what they have SOWN!
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God GAVE THEM OVER to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting.
We see here that Paul states THREE TIMES that “God’s Wrath” is nothing more than allowing mankind to make his own choices and to REAP what he has SOWN. (God GAVE THEM OVER. . .) Again, God does NOT punish. He allows mankind to REAP the consequences of his OWN decisions. He “GIVES THEM OVER” to their own desires!
God does NOT punish Homosexuals anymore than He punishes anyone else for sinning. Our sin leads to its own consequences. Our bad choices will come back to harm us - until we eventually learn to do right.
As Paul continues, in Romans Chapter 1, he reveals what will be the eventual outcome of the sin of homosexuality and lesbianism. The following verses tell us what they will become.
29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness, full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness, whisperers (gossipers)
30 Backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents
31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, unforgiving, unmerciful
32 Who knowing the righteous judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but approve of those that do them.
Aren’t Homosexuals just like Heterosexuals?
If you are a parent, a mother or a father, counseling your son on a future career, would you encourage him to take a job that would:
1) decrease his life expectancy by 30 years
2) give him only a 9% change of living to reach old age
3) put him in a situation where he is 87 times more apt to be murdered than a man not in his occupation
4) make him 35 times more apt to commit suicide
5) increase by 18 times his chance of death by a traffic accident
6) make it virtually impossible for him to have children and a long-term, loving and supportive marriage
7) increase his chance by possibly 100 times of getting a severe intestinal infection that leads to colostomy
8) increase his chance by many thousands of times of getting AIDS
I’m sure you would not recommend any occupation even half as dangerous for your son as the one I just described.
But I didn’t describe an occupation, I described male homosexuality. But you say, homosexuals are born that way. No they’re not. This is an acquired problem and it can be treated and reversed.
References for numbers 1 through 5:
Cameron, P. et al. Life Span of Homosexuals.
Family Research Report, April-June 1991
This was a study of 5,371 obituaries from sixteen U.S. homosexual journals compared to a large sample of obituaries from regular newspapers.
No. 6 is self-explanatory.
For No. 7, there are several references:
New England Journal of Medicine, 1980, 302:463-4
50,000 gay men in San Francisco have some type of serious intestinal infection. This is approximately 30% to 50% of the gay population in San Francisco. This intestinal infection rate is at least 100 times the intestinal infection rate in the heterosexual population.
The proportion of homosexuals with intestinal parasites (worms, flukes ameba) ranges from 25% to nearly 60% depending on the article read. References include Jaffee, H. et al. National Case Control Study of Kaposi’s Sarcomas, Annals of Internal Medicine 1983:00:145-51, Quinn, T.C. et al, The Polymicrobial Origin of Intestinal Infection in Homosexual Men. New England Journal of Medicine 1983:309:576-82 and Biggar, R.J. Low T-lymphocyte Ratios in Homosexual Men, Journal of the American Medical Association 1984:251:1441-46.
Greater than 70% of all AIDS cases are in homosexuals. Homosexuals consist of approximately 5% of the population. The other 30% of AIDS are in the other 95% of the population (e.g. drug addicts, transfusion recipients, etc.)
That means we have approximately 175,000 cases of AIDS in the homosexual population which would be 12.5 million people (5% of 250 million), and we have 75,000 cases among the rest of the population, which would be 95% of 237.5 million. The mathematics show that the chance of getting AIDS is at least a thousand times greater and probably many thousands of times greater in the homosexual community compared to the heterosexual community.
Anal Intercourse (Semen in the Rectum) Suppresses the Immune System
Since the causative agent of AIDS is reliably determined as LAV (lymphadenopathy virus), the question is frequently asked, why are homosexual males exposed to semen by anal coitus, more prone to immune suppression, and fall easy prey to other infections than women in general. Its answer can be found in the striking difference in the tissue structure of the vagina and that of the rectum.
The vagina is lined by the thick stratified layers of squamous epithelium, below which lies the vascular lamina propria, richly supplied with blood and lymphatic vessels. In contrast, the rectum is lined with a single layer of columnar epithelium, below which is no barrier between the columnar epithelium and the underlying blood and lymphatic vessels of the rectal lamina propria. This anomaly between the walls of the vagina and that of the rectum is primarily responsible for making the former more resistant to trauma, erosion or ulceration and easy infiltration of semen into the vascular layer lying below the squamous epithelium, than the latter.
Besides, the nature of the sexual intercourse- either vaginal or anal- plays an important role in the transmission of AIDS. As a rule, women do not often engage in anal sexual intercourse, as frequently as the promiscuous homosexual men. However, some women do happen to acquire AIDS. In this context, one has a reason to suspect that they may have had anal coitus with homosexual or bisexual men with AIDS.
The semen of homosexual men is known to have a greater immuno-suppressive potential than that of heterosexual males, due to complex interaction, i.e. induction of auto-immunity and biochemical changes in the soluble components of the semen. It is a known fact, that auto-immune response- humoral or cellular- is capable of producing tissue injury or biochemical changes in the semen.
If this assumption is true, women who have anal coitus with bisexual males may be more prone to AIDS than those, who have anal sexual intercourse with heterosexual males. And this hypothesis has been confirmed by the fact, women who routinely engage in anal sexual intercourse, exhibit immune abnormalities akin to those found in the homosexual males. Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, Maj. M. P. Vora, Current Medical Practice, Vol. No. 28, No. 11 of November 1984
“Without getting into the emotional side of this issue, and sticking strictly to a scientific understanding of the human body, we have to become aware of a simple fact. The tissues of the vagina and the anus and rectum are designed for different purposes. It is true both have a similar sensory systems attached to a single central mechanism for the registration of pain and pleasure, but structurally they are not the same. The vagina has a thick multilayered cell lining that, while not easily absorbing the semen from inside, is designed to withstand friction and sheering force. Even here, there is a mechanism for secretion of lubricating mucus to withstand these forces. Furthermore, semen has chemical properties that will increase the thickness and resistance of the lining membrane in the vagina.
The seminal fluid secreted with the sperm is a very complex composition. It contains a chemical substance called trans-glutamin-ase (TGE). In certain circumstances, TGE binds some proteins to other proteins. It also causes some cells to die in a special way--to shrivel and not disintegrate, thus its power to produce a thickening of the vaginal wall to cope with normal male-female sex relationships. The semen also contains proteins with extremely strong immune suppressive properties.
It is the immune suppressive property of semen that will facilitate the passage of sperm all the way up into the uterus and its tubes to fertilize the female egg. To the body, the millions of sperm that enter the uterus are the invading foreign "objects" and highly reactionary for the uterine wall and its tubes, had they not been protected by the immune repressive properties of proteins from the semen that bathe the sperm. To survive during nine months of pregnancy, the sperm that has different antigenic properties to the mother's tissue, the mother's immune system has to be suppressed for the duration. It seems that something in the semen (possibly a uteroglobin-like protein that is called SV-IV) codes for the mother's immune suppression. It is this immune-suppressive property of semen that ensures the survival of initially the sperm, and ultimately the fetus during full-term pregnancy until the production of a living offspring.
The semen in the female vagina is not absorbed. Because of the anatomical design and position of the vagina, the semen is drained. On the other hand, the rectum is lined with very thin and delicate cells. In the rectum, the semen is retained and its extremely potent physiological properties are allowed freedom of action. Within the constituents of semen, there are substances that are designed to overtake the host's immune system and force them to shut down the same way that a radar jamming device is used on board warplanes to enter the enemy air-space and deliver their bombs. Thus, semen has independent ability to shut down the immune system of its host tissue if its agents are allowed entry into the recipient's system.
With repeated secretion of semen into a male or a female rectum, immune system suppression is unavoidable--not because of a "virus," but because of the chemical properties of the semen itself. Women, who participate in anal sex to avoid becoming pregnant, should be aware of this immune suppressive property of semen
In addition to all of the above, the intestinal wall is not capable of withstanding the forces involved in rectal manipulation for sexual purposes. The reason why such sexual manipulations become possible is because of one single fact: The intestinal tract does not have an acute pain sensory system if damaged from inside, without the damage affecting the peritoneum. The peritoneum is the thin outside covering of the gastrointestinal tract. It is amply supplied with nerves that will register pain. It is a type of "non-adhesive" that permits the various segments of the intestinal tract to glide over one another in their movements and adaptation to the passage of food. The rectum is not completely covered by peritoneum. New Ideas on AIDS. Excerpted from Your Body’s Many Cries for Water, F. Batmanghelidj, M.D., 1992.
More Evidence of Suppression of the Immune System by the Presence of Semen in Contact with the Rectal Mucosa
Robert S. Root-Bernstein1 and Sheila Hobbs DeWitt2
Department of Physiology, Michigan State University, 48824 East Lansing, MI, USA
Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research Division, 2800 Plymouth Road, 48106-1047 Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Received: 27 January 1994 Accepted: 17 June 1994
Abstract More than 90% of people with AIDS develop circulating immune complexes (CICs) and lymphocytotoxic antibodies (LCTAs). Animals infected with HIV, however, never display CICs or LCTAs, and remain healthy. Similarly, HIV-infected people who do not develop CICs or LCTAs also do not progress to AIDS. The appearance of CICs and LCTAs is, however, highly prognostic for AIDS and death. Since HIV infection does not, per se, lead to the development of CICs and LCTAs, other causes are likely.
One such cause, for which both epidemiologic and experimental evidence exists, is semen. Semen components include sperm, seminal fluid, lymphocytes, and sometimes infectious agents, including HIV, mycoplasmas, and herpes and hepatitis viruses, all of which independently cause immune suppression.
Extensive evidence demonstrates sperm (and various viruses) contains many proteins mimicking the CD4 protein of T-helper cells, while HIV, mycoplasmas, and seminal fluid mimic class II MHC proteins of other lymphocytes. We identify a large number of protein sequences that display such mimicry using computer homology searching, and demonstrate experimentally that sperm antibodies specifically precipitate antibodies against class II MHC mimics such as mycoplasmas, which in turn precipitate antibodies to lymphocyte antigens. These data prove that immunologic exposure to sperm and lymphocytes (as may occur in receptive anal intercourse, needle sharing, or blood transfusions) is theoretically capable of initiating lymphocytotoxic autoimmunity. Such autoimmunity may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of AIDS, and will need to be addressed clinically in high risk individuals regardless of HIV status and regardless of the success of anti-HIV prophylaxis and treatment.
The Homosexual lifestyle is DANGEROUS to himself and his sexual partner, whether the partner is long-term or transient. The Homosexual lifestyle, by definition, causes Severe Diseases of many kinds that lead to Premature Death!
God says, “Thou shalt NOT kill!” Exodus 20:13
Any lifestyle that harms the body and causes premature death can NEVER be condoned by God. Our body is the temple of the Holy Spirit, and “He that defiles God’s temple, Him will God destroy (1 Cor 3:17). But God “destroys” by allowing us to reap what we have sown to learn from our mistakes. In addition, a premature death robs God of the time a person has to serve him, causing the violation of another commandment:
“Thou shalt NOT steal.” Exodus 20:15
But how about “Monogamous” homosexual partners?
God’s word clearly states that homosexual relationships, whether between males or females, is an abomination to God. Those who participate are rejecting God’s Creation of male and female as “One flesh” and His command to “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth.”
In addition, a monogamous homosexual relationship, if indeed it exists at all, is extremely difficult to find.
The Truth About Homosexual Relationships
From The Minnesota Family Council
Are Homosexuals Going to Hell?
Are same-sex partnerships deserving of the same status as traditional marriage?
Are they merely a variation of the same type of relationship? No way, says Dr. Timothy Dailey, senior fellow in the Center for Marriage and Family Studies at the Family Research Council. In the FRC report Comparing the Lifestyles of Homosexual Couples to Married Couples, Dailey analyzes more than 30 years of research by social scientists worldwide, and confirms that same-sex relationships have little resemblance to faithful, monogamous marriage.
Duration of Relationships
Homosexual activists often argue that high divorce rates demonstrate traditional marriage fares no better than same-sex relationships in duration. “The research, however, indicates that male homosexual relationships last only a fraction of the length of most marriages,”
• A 1997 national survey of 884 men and 1,288 women published in the Journal of Sex Research found that 77 percent of married men and 88 percent of married women had remained faithful to their marriage vows.
• A 2002 U.S. Census Bureau study found that 70.7 percent of women married between 1970 and 1974 reached their tenth anniversary and 57.7 percent stayed married for 20 years or longer.
• In a survey of 7,862 homosexuals, the 2003-2004 Gay/Lesbian Consumer Online Census found that of those involved in a “current relationship,” only 15 percent described their current relationship as having lasted 12 years or longer.
Meaning of “Commitment”
Dailey found that even in so-called “committed” homosexual relationships, commitment typically does not mean sexual fidelity:
• A Canadian study of homosexual men who had been in committed relationships lasting longer than one year found that only 25 percent of those interviewed reported being monogamous.
• In The Male Couple, authors David P. McWhirter and Andrew M. Mattison reported that, in a study of 156 males in homosexual relationships lasting from one to 37 years, only seven couples had a totally exclusive sexual relationship, and these men all had been together for less than five years.
• In their classic 1978 study, published as Homosexualities: A Study of Diversity Among Men and Women, researchers Bell and Weinberg found that 43 percent of white male homosexuals had sex with 500 or more partners, with 28 percent having one thousand or more sex partners.
Not a Healthy Lifestyle
Same-sex relationships are notoriously unhealthy and dangerous. Even those that might be labeled “monogamous” (as homosexuals define the term) would be considered high-risk by most accounts:
• The July 1993 issue of the journal AIDS reported that homosexual men involved in steady relationships engaged in unsafe sexual practices more often than homosexual men without a steady partner. Such practices are directly linked to AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases.
• The July 2001 issue of GayHealth reported that the Dutch government found 67 percent of HIV-positive men aged 30 and younger had been infected by a steady partner.
Research also indicates significantly higher levels of violence in homosexual and lesbian relationships compared to traditional married relationships:
• In 1991 the Journal of Social Service Research published a survey of 1,099 lesbians in which slightly more than half of the lesbians said they had been abused by a female lover/partner. The survey noted that “the most frequently indicated forms of abuse were verbal/emotional/psychological abuse and combined physical-psychological abuse.”
• A survey sponsored by the National Institute of Justice found that same-sex couples reported significantly more violence from their partners than did traditional couples.
Noted the report, “Thirty-nine percent of the same-sex cohabitants reported being raped, physically assaulted, and/or stalked by a marital/cohabitating partner at some time in their lifetimes, compared to 21.7 percent of the opposite-sex cohabitants. Among men, the comparable figures are 23.1 percent and 7.4 percent.”
There is NO literal “hell.” The word “hell” has been “written in” by the translators. The four words in the Bible that are mistranslated as “hell” are: Sheol (in the Old Testament), and hades, Tartarus and gehenna in the New Testament.
Both sheol and hades mean literally “the grave.” And Tartarus is defined as the deepest “hades” again “the grave.” None of these three words have anything to do with burning.
The word gehenna refers to the valley of Kidron, right outside Jerusalem, where the garbage was burned. But please note, only the garbage the refuse was burned. Nothing good was burned.
God does NOT burn up His children in a literal hellfire, He only “burns” the sin out of their life. We are told in Malachi 3:2,3
But who shall abide the day of His (God’s) coming? And who shall stand when He appears? For He is like a refiner’s fire, and like a washerman’s soap.
And He shall sit as a refiner and purifier of silver: and He shall purify the sons of Levi, and refine them as gold and silver, that they may offer unto the Lord an offering in righteousness.”
God does NOT destroy the sinner in a literal hellfire, although the person often creates his own “hell.” Instead, just like a refiner purifies the dross from the gold and silver, God purifies the sin from the sinner’s life by allowing him to reap what he has sown.
In this way, God makes him a “new Creature in Christ.” (2 Cor. 5:17)
(For more information, see “Was the Doctrine of Hellfire manufactured by the Theologians?” at www.goodnewsaboutgod.com)
What about Lesbianism Female Homosexuality?
In her book, Restoring Sexual Identity, former lesbian Anne Paulk, married to ex-gay activist John Paulk, and mother of three sons, describes patterns of family dysfunction and woundedness in the lives of many women who have dealt with their same-sex feelings. Childhood trauma, poor self-image, anger at men, poor relationships with either or both parents, and pro-homosexual media propaganda are several key elements in women developing an attraction to other women. A little girl who sees her mother being abused by her father, whether physically, psychologically or emotionally, learns to distrust men and begins to view the “woman” or “wife” image negatively. She does not want to emulate her mother’s role.
Even more, if the young girl, herself, is sexually or emotionally abused by an older male, she learns that looking and acting like a girl can bring about these unwanted results. Consequently, she prefers to look, dress and act mannish to avoid attracting the attention of men. She finds men threatening, unsafe, undesirable, and untrustworthy.
As Paulk notes throughout her book, same-sex attraction is seldom really driven by sexual needs; it is driven by an unconscious desire to be loved and to trust another person. It is also frequently driven by a desire to reconnect with the feminine but in the wrong way.
As in the case of male homosexuality, there is no evidence that lesbianism is genetic. And it is Biblically clear that same-sex relationships, whether male or female, are against God’s will.
Can Homosexuals Change?
Absolutely. Many homosexuals and lesbians have converted to a heterosexual lifestyle.
For at least three decades, competent mental health professionals have suggested that the false notion that homosexuality is unchangeable is a major stumbling block to recovery.
“The homosexual’s real enemy is . . . his ignorance of the possibility that he can be helped, plus his psychic masochism which leads him to shun treatment.” Edmund Bergler (1962) Homosexuality: Disease or Way of Life, p. 67, Collier: New York
“The major challenge in treating homosexuality, from the point of view of the patient’s resistance, has, of course, been the misconception that the disorder is innate or inborn.” Charles W. Socarides (1974) “Homosexuality” in American Handbook of Psychiatry, 2nd Edition, Volume 3, Arieti S., Brody E.B., eds., p 309, Basic Books: New York
“The homosexually inclined, even if they are, in principle, willing to change, initially have serious doubts whether there are realistic chances of a profound improvement. These are periodically returning doubts, notwithstanding clearly observable progress, and they only die when the change in feelings has become much more obvious . . . Hope and faith are excellent barriers to these harmful thoughts that are a drain on the person’s enthusiasm and energy.” Gerard van den Aardweg (1986) Homosexuality and Hope: A Psychologist Talks About Treatment and Change, p 89, Servant Books: Ann Arbor, MI
Dr. Joseph Nicolosi, a Christian Psychologist, has had excellent success with homosexuals who want to change. He has found that the key is to help the homosexual male establish mature, non-sexual, friendships with heterosexual men.
NARTH, National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality is an organization of psychiatrists and psychologists devoted to helping interested homosexuals change their orientation.
Even historic Gay Advocate, Robert L. Spitzer, M.D., the psychiatrist who led the team that deleted homosexuality from the diagnostic manual in 1973, now says that homosexuality is changeable!
Read his story at the end of this study.
The largest information and referral ministry in the world addressing homosexual issues is EXODUS International. For 30 years, Exodus has served men and women who are affected by homosexuality. Freedom is possible through Jesus Christ.
The Governing of our World by Natural Law
There are laws that govern our world such as the law of gravity. These laws are operating on ALL of us whether we like it or not, and even whether we know about them or not. If you RESIST the Law of gravity and choose to jump from a high building believing that you will go UP and not DOWN, you will be sadly mistaken and may even die as a result of your foolish, arrogant thinking.
There are other natural laws of physics that are immutable, as well, such as a force hitting an immovable object (car crash) than can maim or kill us. The bottom line is that these laws, set up by God, are operating on us whether we like it or not.
Likewise, there are natural laws of chemistry, astronomy, physiology and health. The more we know about them and understand them and live WITHIN them the happier and healthier we will be. Ignorance of these laws, or resisting the knowledge of them, will only lead to disaster.
In order to live a long and healthy life, we must live life God’s way and NOT our own way. If we live WITHIN these laws, we will live a long and healthy life. But if we disobey these natural laws we will make our own “hell.”
Living Life GOD’S way!
God told Noah, “I’ll save you from the flood but you must do things MY way. You must build a boat, but you must build it EXACTLY the way I tell you. You CANNOT build the boat YOUR way and expect to be saved from the flood.”
God said to Moses, “Build the Sanctuary in the wilderness but you must do it MY way, all the way down to the last tassel.”
God tells us He will “heal ALL our diseases” Psalm 103:3, but we MUST do it HIS way! “IF you obey My laws, commands and decrees, I WILL keep you FREE from EVERY disease!” Deuteronomy 7:11-15
God tells us, He is the Savior of ALL mankind” (1 Timothy 4:10) but we must live life HIS way NOT our own way.
God’s way is not only the best way it is the ONLY way! Man CANNOT improve on God’s way, no matter how hard he tries because - You Can’t Improve on God!
Homosexuality is NOT genetic.
Homosexuality is NOT a choice, except in rare cases.
Homosexuality is NOT the fault of the homosexual initially. But he must take responsibility for his homosexual lifestyle and overcome it.
Homosexuality is an acquired condition, primarily due to dysfunctional family relationships and is usually established by the age of 3-5 years.
Homosexuality is NOT condoned by God. He made man and woman as heterosexuals. He provides the strength for the homosexual to change.
Homosexuality is a self-destructive, dysfunctional, acquired lifestyle that results in disease, both physical and mental, and often leads to a premature death.
The homosexual CAN change to a happy and healthy heterosexual lifestyle, and there are MANY organizations available to help in that change.
The Jewish/Zionist/Illuminati New World Order is behind the massive propaganda campaign to promote homosexuality and to resist the fact that homosexuals can change. Their sinister goal is the destruction of the family, degeneration of the culture, and extermination of most of the population.
The Homosexual Movement is run, from behind the scenes, by the Jewish Zionists who are using the homosexuals and lesbians as pawns in their subversive battle for control of the World.
God does NOT destroy His children in a literal hellfire. He purifies them of their sin through trouble, by allowing them to reap what they have sown. Thus, He makes them “New Creatures” in Christ.
Freedom from homosexuality, both male and female, is possible in Jesus Christ.
“God is the Saviour of ALL mankind. . .” God will SAVE every person He has ever created AFTER God has changed him or her into His image!
Yes, the Bible is CLEAR on this issue!
© Lorraine Day, M.D. 2007. All Rights Reserved.
This document cannot be reproduced in any form
except for downloading for personal use.
Historic Gay Advocate Now Believes
Change is Possible
May 9, 2001 - The psychiatrist who led the team that deleted homosexuality from the diagnostic manual in 1973, now says homosexuality may sometimes be changeable.
His provocative new study drew worldwide media attention at the American Psychiatric Association's annual conference on May 9th.
Dr. Robert L. Spitzer's study was funded by his department's research unit. He is Professor of Psychiatry and Chief of Biometrics at Columbia University.
"Like most psychiatrists," says Dr. Spitzer, "I thought that homosexual behavior could be resisted--but that no one could really change their sexual orientation. I now believe that's untrue--some people can and do change."
Most mental-health associations have recently issued warnings about therapy to change sexual orientation. Homosexual fantasies and feelings can be renounced or resisted, most clinicians agree--but not transformed.
But in a panel discussion at the annual A.P.A. meeting, Spitzer released the evidence for his conclusions.
He reported interviewing 200 subjects (143 men and 57 women) who were willing to describe their sexual and emotional histories, including their self-reported shift from gay to straight.
Dr. Spitzer is best recognized in psychiatric history for his scientific role in 1973--he led the team that investigated whether homosexuality should be removed from the psychiatric manual. He drew bitter criticism during that historic event from psychoanalysts who sought to retain homosexuality among the list of disorders. Since then, Dr. Spitzer had been convinced that sexual orientation is unchangeable.
But on the opening day of the American Psychiatric Association's annual conference two years ago--in 1999--he was drawn to a group of ex-gays staging a demonstration at the entrance to the conference building.
The picketers were objecting to the A.P.A.'s recent resolution discouraging therapy to change homosexuality to heterosexuality. They carried placards saying, "Homosexuals Can Change--We Did--Ask Us!"
Others said, "Don't Affirm Me into a Lifestyle that was Killing Me Physically and Spiritually," and "The APA Has Betrayed America with Politically Correct Science."
Some of the psychiatrists tore up the literature handed out to them by the protesters. But others stopped to offer the protestors a few quiet words of encouragement.
Dr. Spitzer was skeptical, but he decided to find out for himself if sexual orientation was changeable. He developed a 45-minute telephone interview which he personally admistered to all the subjects. Most had been referred to him by The National Association of Research and Therapy of Homosexuality and by Exodus, a ministry for homosexual strugglers. To be eligible for the study, the subjects had to experience a significant shift from homosexual to heterosexual attraction which had lasted for at least five years.
Most of the subjects said their religious faith was very important in their lives, and about three-quarters of the men and half of the women had been heterosexually married by the time of the study. Most had sought change because a gay lifestyle had been emotionally unsatisfying. Many had been disturbed by promiscuity, stormy relationships, a conflict with their religious values, and the desire to be (or to stay) heterosexually married.
Typically, the effort to change did not produce significant results for the first two years. Subjects said they were helped by examining their family and childhood experiences, and understanding how those factors might have contributed to their gender identity and sexual orientation. Same-sex mentoring relationships, behavior-therapy techniques and group therapy were also mentioned as particularly helpful.
To the researchers' surprise, good heterosexual functioning was reportedly achieved by 67% of the men who had rarely or never felt any opposite-sex attraction before the change process. Nearly all the subjects said they now feel more masculine (in the case of men) or more feminine (women).
"Contrary to conventioned wisdom," Spitzer concluded, "some highly motivated individuals, using a variety of change efforts, can make substantial change in multiple indicators of sexual orientation, and achieve good heterosexual functioning."
He added that change from homosexual to heterosexual is not usually a matter of "either/or," but exists on a continuum--that is, a diminishing of homosexuality and an expansion of heterosexual potential that is exhibited in widely varying degrees.
But, Dr. Spitzer said, his findings suggest that complete change--cessation of all homosexual fantasies and attractions (which is generally considered an unrealistic goal in most therapies) is probably quite uncommon. Still, when subjects did not actually change sexual orientation--for example, their change had been one of behavioral control and self-identity, but no significant shift in attractions--they still reported an improvement in overall emotional health and functioning.
This study is believed to be the most detailed investigation of sexual orientation change to date, in that it assessed a variety of homosexual indicators. Previous studies have usually assessed only one or two dimensions of sexual orientation, such as behavior and attraction. The assessment tool was developed with the assistance of New York psychiatrist Dr. Richard C. Friedman.
Dr. Spitzer used a structured interview so that others could know exactly what questions were asked, and what response choices were offered to the subjects. The full data file is now available to other researchers, including tape-recordings of about a third of the interviews, which (with the subjects' permission and without any reference to their names) can be listened to by investigators who wish to carry such research further.
He expressed his gratitude to the National Association of Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), and to the ex-gay ministry Exodus, "without which this study would not have been possible."
American Psychiatric Association president Daniel Borenstein was asked by the
Washington Post to comment on the recent Spitzer study. "There are a group of people who think all homosexual behavior must be changed...and they try to impose their values [on gay men and lesbians}, which is inappropriate," he said.
Dr. Spitzer agreed that this study should not be used to justify coercion. Nor should it be used as an argument for the denial of civil rights. "But patients should have the right," Spitzer stated, "to explore their heterosexual potential."
--Linda Ames Nicolosi