How Near is the Coming Time of Trouble?

Destruction of American Culture 

Lorraine Day, M.D. 

Let’s look at the Goals of the enemies of God – and the enemies of a purportedly Christian nation.  We can then see how they are accomplishing their work, and how close they are to fulfilling their goals. 

There are three documents available, written by the enemies of Christ and Christians, detailing their plan for ruling the world (see attached): 

1. Protocols of the Elders of Zion
2. Congressional Record, January 10, 1963
3. Georgia Guidestones 

    Destruction of Christianity: America used to be a Christian country.  

    According to a Gallup poll, 78% of Americans identify with some form of Christian religion, a proportion that has been declining in recent decades. The major reason for this decline has been an increase in the percentage of Americans claiming no religious identity, now at 13% of all adults.

    The trend results are based on annual averages of Gallup's religious identity data in America that stretch back over 60 years. One of the most significant trends documented during this period is the substantial increase in the percentage of American adults who don't identify with any specific religion. In 1948, only 2% of Americans did not identify with a religion. That percentage began to rise in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Eleven years ago, in 1998, 6% of Americans did not identify with a religion, a number that rose to 10% by 2002. This year's average of 13% of Americans who claim no religious identity is the highest in Gallup records.

    The percentage of Americans who identify as Catholic, Protestant, or some other non-Catholic Christian faith has been concomitantly decreasing over the years. This suggests that one of the major patterns of religious transition in America in recent decades has been the shift from identification as Christian to the status of having no specific religious identification.

    In 1948, 91% of Americans identified with a Christian faith. Twenty years ago, in 1989, 82% of Americans identified as Christian. Ten years ago, it was 84%. This year, as noted, 78% of all American adults identify with a Christian faith.

    Personal Importance of Religion

    Does the decrease in religious identity signify that religion is losing its importance for Americans? There was a substantial drop in the percentage of Americans who said religion was "very important" in their lives between the 1960s and the 1970s -- from 70% in 1965 to 52% by 1978 -- but in recent decades, this "very important" percentage has remained relatively steady. The overall figure today -- 56% -- is slightly higher than it was 31 years ago. 

    Denigration of honesty 

    Sitcoms on television make heroes out of those who lie.  Politicians lie.  The media lies continually.  The government lies. And virtually all Americans lie every day.  People in court raise their right hand and swear to tell the truth – then they lie to the judge!  Everybody lies! 

    In the book, The Day America Told the Truth, of the people surveyed, the authors found these results:

    91% lie about trivial matters;

    36% lie about important matters;

    86% regularly lie to parents,

    75% regularly lie to friends,

    73% regularly lie to siblings, and

    69% regularly lie to spouses.

    (From Daily Bread, 8/28/1992

    And this includes Christians as well.  This study found that almost all Christians also lie every day.

    Truth-tellers – now often known as “whistle blowers” are hunted down like wild animals, prosecuted, and put in prison for life, that is – if they are not assassinated by our government. 

    The Mysterious Death of Karen Silkwood


    Thirty-six years ago today, union activist and plutonium plant worker Karen Silkwood was found dead in what police ruled a single-car accident. But the circumstances surrounding her death have kept people guessing to this day.

    Karen Silkwood was born in 1946 and grew up in Nederland, Texas. After attending college for a year, she married an oil worker and had three children before she abandoned her family and moved to Oklahoma City. Her children were 5 years, 3 years and 18 months old when she left them, telling her oldest daughter Kristi that she was going out to buy some cigarettes.

    Shortly thereafter, she took a $4 per hour job as a metallography technician at the Cimarron plutonium plant operated by Kerr-McGee near Crescent, Oklahoma. Her duties there included polishing fuel rods packed with radioactive plutonium pellets. While at the plant, she joined the Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Union, who staged a strike at Cimarron not long after she started working there. When the strike ended in failure, many of the workers severed ties with the union. Not Silkwood, however, and as a member of the bargaining committee (the first woman to hold the position in the union’s history) was charged with investigating health and safety issues at the plant.

    In the summer of 1974, Silkwood testified to the Atomic Energy Commission that she had found serious violations of health and safety regulations – including evidence of spills, leaks, faulty fuel rods and enough missing plutonium to make multiple nuclear weapons. She also alleged the company had falsified inspection records.

    Not long after, some strange things began happening.

    On November 5th, during a routine check, Silkwood discovered she had been exposed to over 400 times the legal limit for plutonium. She was sent home with a sample kit to conduct more self-tests. The following morning, despite having handled no dangerous materials as part of her job that day, she tested positive once more. On the 7th, plutonium contamination was found in her lungs and she was sent to Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico for further testing.

    Silkwood believed she was deliberately contaminated as a result of her whistleblowing efforts against Kerr-McGee. The company would later maintain in court that she willfully contaminated herself in an effort to make them look culpable. While radiation levels at her apartment were high, no radiation was detected either in her car or her work locker.

    By November 13th, she had decided to go public with her story. She gathered evidence documenting the plant’s wrongdoing and was enroute to meet a national representative of her union and a New York Times reporter in Oklahoma City when her car went off the road and struck a culvert, killing Silkwood. She was 28-years-old.

    Quaaludes were found both in her car and in her bloodstream, and the Oklahoma State Troopers ruled that she had fallen asleep at the wheel. But her family and supporters noted there were skidmarks in the road – how could she have hit the brakes while asleep? Dents and paint scrapes on her rear bumper lead her supporters to believe that she was deliberately forced off the road by a trailing vehicle. The documents she’d planned to share with the New York Times reporter were never found.

    The publicity surrounding the case led to a federal investigation of the plant, where many of Silkwood's allegations were proven true. Kerr-McGee closed Cimarron in 1975.

    Silkwood’s father and children filed suit against the company, not for wrongful death, but for willful negligence leading to her plutonium contamination. According to the book The Killing of Karen Silkwood by Richard Raschke, the family's lawyers were harassed, intimidated and even physically assaulted. A key witness for the plantiffs also committed suicide before her scheduled testimony. The jury, nonetheless, found in their favor, awarding the family $10.5 million. On appeal, the amount was reduced to a mere $5,000 – to cover the destruction of Karen’s personal belongings during the decontamination of her apartment. The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the case and it was headed for retrial when Kerr-McGee settled out of court for $1.38 million. They admitted no wrongdoing as part of the settlement.

    James Forrestal – First U.S. Secretary of Defense

    Who Killed James Forrestal?

    James V. Forrestal was America's first Secretary of Defense.  He was also the leading official in the Truman administration opposing the creation and U.S. recognition of the state of Israel.  President Truman relieved Forrestal of his position in late March of 1949.  Within a few days he was committed, apparently against his will, to Bethesda Naval Hospital suffering from "exhaustion."  In spite of the invaluable service he had rendered to the country during World War II, first as Under Secretary of the Navy and then Secretary of the Navy, he had in 1948 and early 1949 been the subject of an unprecedented press vilification campaign, led by powerful columnists Drew Pearson and Walter Winchell.

    At around 1:45 am, May 22, some seven weeks after his admission to the hospital, Forrestal plunged from a 16th floor window of the hospital to his death.  A belt or cord, said to be from his dressing gown, was tied tightly around his neck.

    On May 23, a review board was appointed by Admiral Morton D. Willcutts, the head of the National Naval Medical Center to investigate the death.  The board completed its work on May 31, but not until October 11 did it publish a brief, summary report of only a few lines.  No explanation of the delay was given.  The summary concluded that Forrestal had died from the fall, but it had nothing to say about what caused the fall, except to conclude that no one associated with the Navy was responsible.  In short, it did not conclude that he had committed suicide, as initial reports stated and the public is still given to believe.  No mention was made in the summary, or in those later October press reports, of the belt around Forrestal's neck.

    The Willcutts Report, itself, was kept secret, and, curiously, no hue and cry was raised over that fact.  After two unsuccessful Freedom of Information Act tries with the National Naval Medical Center, I was finally able to get the report of the review board from the office of the Navy's Judge Advocate General, and my analysis is at .

    At the time of the death, all the press made much of a book containing a morbid poem from Sophocles, "Chorus from Ajax," that Forrestal had supposedly been copying from shortly before his plunge from the window.  The press reports all say that the book and a transcription "were found," but they never say by whom.  Neither does the Willcutts Report.  No witness is produced who claims to have discovered the book or the transcription.  Rather, the first person to get a good look at Forrestal's vacated hospital room found broken glass on his bed, a likely sign of some sort of struggle.  She also described bedclothes half turned back, but the official "crime scene" photographs taken many hours later, show a bed with a bare mattress, an obvious sign of a cover-up.  One can also see that articles were moved around from one picture to the next:  Needless to say, no news report has ever mentioned the broken glass or the laundering of the room before photographs were taken.

    Pro-Israel writers like Arnold Rogow, Winchell biographer, Neal Gabler, Jack Anderson, Charles Higham, John Loftus, and Mark Aarons have continued the character assassination against Forrestal, falsely characterizing him as an anti-Semitic nut who had made several previous suicide attempts.  This claim of several previous suicide attempts, echoed at this Arlington Cemetery web site: , is virtually proved to be false by the testimony of Forrestal's Bethesda Hospital doctors in the Willcutts Report.  They agree that, from all indications, he had never before attempted suicide.

    The indications are very strong that Forrestal kept his no-suicide-attempt record intact on May 22, 1949, and became another casualty of the creation of the state of Israel in the same sense that Lord Moyne, Count Bernadotte, Yitzhak Rabin, Rachel Corrie, 34 crewmen on the USS Liberty, and Palestinian leaders on a regular basis have been casualties.

    The Willcutts Report is available in pdf form on the web site of the Seeley Mudd Manuscript Library at Princeton University.  Copies should also be available for perusal at the Harry S. Truman Library in Independence, Missouri, and the Library of Congress.  I have given the appropriate officials at these libraries compact discs of the report. 

    David Martin, September 27, 2004


    Two months after posting this article, I revealed in Part 3 of “Who Killed James Forrestal?” the strongest evidence yet that Forrestal was murdered.  I obtained Forrestal handwriting samples that clearly differ radically from the handwriting of the copied Sophocles poem.   Another important research milestone was reached in early February of 2010 when the proprietor of the web site, who uses the nom de plume of “Mark Hunter,” put up a searchable htm version of the Willcutts Report, complete with his own analysis.

    David Martin

    November 17, 2010 

    Julian Assange – Wikileaks

    WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange exposes secrets of a major financial institution




    After spilling information on everything from the love life of a dictator to top state secrets, WikiLeaks has a new target: a major U.S. financial firm.

    In an interview with Forbes published on Monday, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said the site would release tens of thousands of documents in early 2011 that he claimed would be comparable to the Enron trial.

    "It will give a true and representative insight into how banks behave at the executive level in a way that will stimulate investigations and reforms, I presume," he promised.

    Assange confirmed to Forbes that the upcoming leaks were about a U.S.-based financial institution, but refused to give any more detail about which bank it was.

    While WikiLeaks made its name on publishing secret military and government documents, Assange says he has a huge amount of documents revealing private sector secrets too - in fact, he told Forbes, 50 percent of "whistleblower" submissions he has received are non-governmental documents.

    The WikiLeaks founder warns that the next batch of documents he'll release will reveal flagrant violations, unethical practices and internal executive decision making structures.

    "You could call it the ecosystem of corruption," he told Forbes.

    In the near future, Assange said Wikileaks may be focusing its efforts on exposing secrets about finance and the private sector, including banks across the world and other major companies.

    "We have a lot of finance related things," he said. "Of the commercial sectors we've covered, finance is the most significant."

    Assange justified the future havoc he will wreak with his philosophy that leaking the information will mean good business for people who embrace ethical business practices and treat their employees well. After all, according to him, happy employees don't leak documents that will hurt their employer.

    "Let's say you want to run a good company," he said. "It's nice to have an ethical workplace. Your employees are much less likely to screw you over if they're not screwing other people over."

    The U.S. Government and the Big Bankers are so irate at Assange’s truth-telling that they apparently have framed him on bogus rape charges in order to put him away.

    Julian Assange has recently made his first public appearance since he took refuge two months ago inside Ecuador's Embassy in London to avoid extradition to Sweden on sex crimes allegations, because Sweden would then allow his extradition to the U.S. for prosecution.

    President John F. Kennedy

    Part of President Kennedy’s head was blown off by rifle bullets – on international television – as a warning to any future U.S. president who dared cross Israel.  For instance, Kennedy had forbid Israel to buy or develop nuclear weapons, he had threatened to eliminate the CIA which he knew was run by the Jews and was undermining his authority as president, he had signed a document ending the war in Vietnam which the Jewish International Bankers wanted to keep going, as they were making money by funding both sides of the war, and Kennedy had vowed to get rid of the Federal Reserve (the Board members of which are ALL Jewish) and start printing U.S. dollars (instead of Federal Reserve notes) under the auspices of Congress, according to the dictates of the U.S. Constitution.

    So the Jews had Kennedy assassinated.  For more information, read “Final Judgment” by Michael Collins Piper.

    How Bad Has it Gotten?

    The Liars (the U.S. Government and the International Jewish Bankers) are prosecuting and murdering the Truth-tellers.  What could be more Satanic?

    Destruction of the family

    Loss Of Parental Rights? United Nations and Progressives in Hot Pursuit

      .                        January 24, 2011


    By Carmen Reynolds,, Editor-in-Chief

    Just try coming between a mother and her suckling infant.  Or a mama grizzly.

    Any predator must first posit the dire consequences of interfering with a parent while nurturing its offspring – until now.

    As Orwellian as it may seem, powerful leaders, activist judges and the United Nations have been quietly working to remove parental rights.

    The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Treaty aims to give “the state” new powers, usurping parental rights, establishing the child and the United Nations (Hillary’s Village) as  partners in determining what is best for the child.

    This could prohibit children from being spanked or homeschooled, ban youngsters from facing the death penalty and forbid parents from deciding their families’ religion.

    Michael Farris of Purcellville, Va., is president of, chairman of the Home School Legal Defense Association and chancellor of Patrick Henry College. He told WorldNet Daily that under the purview of this treaty, every decision a parent makes can be reviewed by the government to determine whether it is in the child’s best interest.

    Under international law, this treaty would override our U.S. Constitution.  Already in Europe, homeschooled children are being removed from parents’ homes.

    Take the case of homeschooled Domenic Johansson of Sweden. In June 2009 Swedish police boarded a plane where the Johanssons were leaving the country for Mrs. Johansson’s home country of India. The police had no warrant and did not charge the Johanssons with a crime.

    The family continues to be kept apart through actions of Swedish government officials. Nine-year-old Domenic remains in state foster care, now separated from his parents Christer and Annie for more than 18 months. Christer, who took Domenic home for a short but “unapproved” overnight visit in early December, is still imprisoned.

    In 2008, Gerno and Andrea Schöneich, along with their four children, fled Germany to New Zealand where they hoped they would be free to live and educate their children in peace. As homeschool parents, they faced threats from authorities, hefty fines, and even jail time. German authorities continue to show extreme prejudice toward homeschoolers, prompting families to leave their homeland rather than give up homeschooling.

    Unable to obtain work permits in New Zealand, and unable to return to Germany because of the very real fear that their younger children could be removed from their custody, the Schöneichs decided to apply for political asylum in New Zealand. In mid-November the family received invitations to present their claim for refugee status before New Zealand officials. The family is representing themselves in the asylum process, and after many months, he has obtained a work permit.

    Now ratified by 193 nations, CRC is the most widely-adopted human rights treaty of any kind, with the United States and Somalia the sole hold outs.  Progressives in the Administration want to change that, counting on unaware Americans to ramrod this outright threat to parental rights and American sovereignty through Congress.

    The two central principles of the CRC are the “best interest of the child” and “the child’s right of participation” in all relevant matters.

    In a 1980s Washington case, a child didn’t wish to attend church as frequently as his parents. The child was then removed from the home, despite no allegations of abuse.  The attorney for the parents did not appeal because the court ruled the child needn’t attend church but once per week, and they feared losing permanent custody.

    “This case is an absolute perfect example of what would happen if the United States were to adopt the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child,” states which advocates for a Parental Rights Amendment in the U.S. Congress to prohibit the effects of a UN treaty.

    The United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child issued an official report Sept. 29, 2006, regarding Ireland.  It urged the state party to prohibit all forms of corporal punishment in the family and sensitize and educate parents and the public about the unacceptability of corporal punishment. It also identified a lack of information provided to the students on reproductive health.

    In the 1995 report on the United Kingdom’s compliance with the CRC, it was criticized for allowing parents to make decisions to remove their child from participation in sex education classes in government schools without adequate measures to ensure that the child’s viewpoints were considered and weighed appropriately.

    There are many troubling aspects of this treaty, if passed:

    Ten things you need to know about the substance of the CRC:

      .    Parents would no longer be able to administer reasonable spankings to their children.

      .    A murderer aged 17 years and 11 months and 29 days at the time of his crime could no longer be sentenced to life in prison.

      .    Children would have the ability to choose their own religion while parents would only have the authority to give their children advice about religion.

      .    The best interest of the child principle would give the government the ability to override every decision made by every parent if a government worker disagreed with the parent’s decision.

      .    A child’s “right to be heard” would allow him (or her) to seek governmental review of every parental decision with which the child disagreed.

      .    According to existing interpretation, it would be illegal for a nation to spend more on national defense than it does on children’s welfare.

      .    Children would acquire a legally enforceable right to leisure.

      .    Christian schools that refuse to teach “alternative worldviews” and teach that Christianity is the only true religion “fly in the face of article 29″ of the treaty.

      .    Allowing parents to opt their children out of sex education has been held to be out of compliance with the CRC.

      .    Children would have the right to reproductive health information and services, including abortions, without parental knowledge or consent.


    Destruction of the Economy:  BIG Stores 

    Is Wal-Mart Destroying America? 20 Facts About Wal-Mart That Will Absolutely Shock You 

    Michael Snyder, Contributor

    Activist Post 

    America absolutely loves Wal-Mart. 100 million customers visit Wal-Mart every single week in this country. But is Wal-Mart good for America? That is a question that most people never stop and ask. 

    Most of us love shopping in big, clean stores that are packed with super cheap merchandise, but the truth is that Wal-Mart is destroying America in a lot of ways. 

    As you will see below, Wal-Mart has destroyed tens of thousands of small businesses and countless manufacturing jobs over the past couple of decades. Wal-Mart has become a gigantic retail behemoth that sells five times more stuff than any other retailer in the United States. Unfortunately, about 85 percent of all the stuff sold at Wal-Mart is made overseas. What that is costing the U.S. economy in terms of lost jobs and lost revenue is incalculable. But Wal-Mart is a perfect example of where our economic system is headed. 

    Our economy is becoming completely and totally dominated by highly centralized monolithic predator corporations that ruthlessly crush all competition and that will stoop to just about anything in order to cut costs. In the future, will we all be working for gigantic communal entities that funnel all of the wealth and economic rewards to a very tiny elite? That sounds very much like how communist China works, and red-blooded Americans should want no part of that. America is supposed to be about free enterprise and competition and working together to build up this country, and Wal-Mart is destroying all of that. 

    The following are 20 facts about Wal-Mart that will absolutely shock you.... 

    #1 The average U.S. family now spends more than $4000 a year at Wal-Mart. 

    #2 In 2010, Wal-Mart had revenues of 421 billion dollars. That amount was greater than the GDP of 170 different countries including Norway, Venezuela and the United Arab Emirates. 

    #3 If Wal-Mart was a nation, it would have the 23rd largest GDP in the world. 

    #4 Wal-Mart now sells more groceries than anyone else in America does. In the United States today, one out of every four grocery dollars is spent at Wal-Mart. 

    #5 Amazingly, 100 million customers shop at Wal-Mart every single week. 

    #6 Wal-Mart has opened more than 1,100 "supercenters" since 2005 alone. 

    #7 Today, Wal-Mart has more than 2 million employees. 

    #8 If Wal-Mart was an army, it would be the second largest military on the planet behind China. 

    #9 Wal-Mart is the largest employer in 25 different U.S. states. 

    #10 According to the Economic Policy Institute, trade between Wal-Mart and China resulted in the loss of 133,000 manufacturing jobs in the United States between 2001 and 2006. 

    #11 The CEO of Wal-Mart makes more in a single hour than a full-time Wal-Mart associate makes in an entire year. 

    #12 Tens of thousands of Wal-Mart employees and their children are enrolled in Medicaid and are dependent on the government for healthcare. 

    #13 Between 2001 and 2007, the value of products that Wal-Mart imported from China grew from $9 billion to $27 billion. 

    #14 Sadly, about 85 percent of all the products sold at Wal-Mart are made outside of the United States. 

    #15 It is being reported that about 80 percent of all Wal-Mart suppliers are in China at this point. 

    #16 Amazingly, 96 percent of all Americans now live within 20 miles of a Wal-Mart. 

    #17 The number of "independent retailers" in the United States declined by 60,000 between 1992 and 2007. 

    #18 According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Wal-Mart spent 7.8 million dollars on political lobbying during 2011. That number does not even include campaign contributions. 

    #19 Today, Wal-Mart has five times the sales of the second largest U.S. retailer (Costco). 

    #20 The combined net worth of six members of the Walton family is roughly equal to the combined net worth of the poorest 30 percent of all Americans. 

    All over the country, independent retailers are going out of business because they cannot compete with Wal-Mart and their super cheap Chinese products. Often communities will give Wal-Mart huge tax breaks just to move in to their areas. But what many communities don't take into account is that the introduction of a Wal-Mart is often absolutely devastating to small businesses.... 

    A study of small and rural towns in Iowa showed lost sales for local businesses ranging from -17.2% in small towns to -61.4% in rural areas, amounting to a total dollar loss of $2.46 BILLION over a 13-year period. 

    When we buy stuff made by people working for slave labor wages in China, we destroy good paying American jobs and we make America poorer. This is a point that I have tried to make over and over. 

    Wal-Mart often tells one thing to the public and then does another thing in private. Sadly, the truth is that Wal-Mart does not care about U.S. manufacturing jobs. Wal-Mart just wants to get products as cheaply as they possibly can, and most of the time that means getting them from China. 

    Just check out this first-hand testimony from an 81-year-old retired apparel manufacturer.... 

    I was president of the Southwestern Apparel Manufacturers Association. There was a meeting sometime between 1985 and 1990. Walmart had contacted our organization and asked if they could meet with us at our beautiful Apparel Mart we had here in Dallas, which has now been razed, because all the independent merchants don’t exist that used to come to it. Two people from Walmart came down and they said they were going to be sourcing goods from overseas and we would have to meet those prices for consumer products and to get ready for it—we are going to be sourcing the world. Walmart was the only company that came out and said this.  

    It was sort of shocking: I was selling them some merchandise at the time. On the back of their trucks it was saying 'Bring it Back to America!' They had the big 'keep it in America' program going at that time on the big signs in the stores. Meanwhile when I reminded the buyer of that, she told me, 'that is just for domestic consumption, we’re going to buy at the cheapest we can anywhere on earth.'

    As I have written about previously, the United States has lost more than 56,000 manufacturing facilities since 2001. 

    We are losing millions of good jobs that cannot be replaced. If you can believe it, the United States has actually lost an average of about 50,000 manufacturing jobs a month since China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001. 

    Last year, the U.S. trade deficit with China was the biggest trade deficit that one nation has had with another nation in the history of the world, and Wal-Mart played a huge role in that. 

    In fact, Wal-Mart has actually been forcing some U.S. manufacturers to pack up and move overseas. The following is from a recent article by Amy Traub.... 

    Walmart’s market power is so immense that the even the largest suppliers must comply with its demands for lower and lower prices because they cannot afford to have their goods taken off its shelves. Companies that used to manufacture products in the United States, from Levi’s jeans to lock maker Master Lock, were pressured to shut their U.S. factories and moved manufacturing abroad to meet Walmart’s demand for low prices. 

    Unfortunately, the vast wealth that Wal-Mart is sucking out of our communities is not put back into our communities. The profits are funneled out to Wal-Mart executives and shareholders. We may enjoy the low prices, but very little of the money that we give to Wal-Mart gets recycled in our local areas. 

    In the old days, you could actually support a family selling electronics or running a general store. But you can't support a family working at Wal-Mart. The vast majority of the jobs that Wal-Mart creates are very low paying. Large numbers of Wal-Mart employees are actually on welfare, and this is part of the reason why we have seen such an explosion in the number of the working poor in America 

    At this point, more than 40 percent of all jobs in America are low wage jobs and the middle class is rapidly disappearing. 

    If we do not support American jobs and American manufacturers they will continue to go away and the welfare rolls in this country will continue to explode. 

    There is not going to be any prosperity in this country without jobs. Unfortunately, most Americans simply do not understand how good jobs are being systematically destroyed in America every single day. 

    The path that America is headed on today is only going to end in complete and total disaster. We are being transformed from a wealthy nation into a poor nation. In the end, we will be dominated by a very tiny elite and everyone else will either be among the working poor or will be totally dependent on the government. 

    Our system is supposed to be about open, honest competition. But that is not what Wal-Mart is about. Wal-Mart is about crushing small businesses and manufacturers here in America and getting us all to buy their super cheap Chinese-made goods. 

    Shame on Wal-Mart. They are an un-American disgrace. 

    Destruction of Quality workmanship– cheap merchandise 

    When appliances and other products were made years ago in the U.S., the company owners’ goal was to make a fine product that would last for years.  Refrigerators, vacuum cleaners, washing machines and other appliances often lasted for 20 years or more and some were even warrantied for that long.  Many of these corporations were built from the ground up by “Gentile” Christians who believed in an honest day’s pay for an honest day’s work, and the making of a fine product – of which they could be proud. 

    But now that almost all major corporations are owned by Jews, the only important goal for them is the bottom line: how much money can I make.  There is no pride in the making of a good product.  Every appliance is made to last no longer than its warranty, which is usually 1 year or less.  Everything is made to self-destruct – and become disposable.  Most small appliances cannot be fixed.  They have to be junked and one must purchase a new one – which is exactly what the Jewish corporate owners want.  

    Destruction of Education: changing of history, spelling, math, English, all learning,           

    For approximately one hundred years, education in America has been controlled by subversive organizations. These organizations have used, and are continuing to use, education as a tool of oppression. This infiltration has led to the decay of morality, freedom, and prosperity in this country. The end goal through the covert control of the educational system is to destroy the United States Constitution and subjugate the American people, along with the rest of the world„s people, into a one-world totalitarian government. Our children are being indoctrinated daily with humanism conducive to world government. Education “reform” in the present day is a scam as both sides of the debate are controlled by the same interests. This fictitious debate is part of a Hegelian dialectic designed to indoctrinate our children into humanism and collectivism while giving them just enough workforce education to serve their corporate masters in the global economy.

    Early experimental psychologists, adhering to humanist ideology, thought that man could be conditioned or molded in any way desired as long as the psychologists applied the proper techniques. The late 1800s marked a time when educational theory in America began to shift away from schools imparting knowledge to children to schools that focused on changing behavior in children. Psychologists began to ponder not what kinds of things should be taught, but rather what kind of children they wanted to mold for society. In the early years of the twentieth century, powerful families, namely the Rockefellers and Carnegies, would lend financial support to the research efforts of the behavioral psychologists, which forever changed American education and society in a negative manner. In 1921, the Rockefeller- dominated Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) was established. This insidious, pro-socialist world government organization has had a profound effect on education in America and continues to at present. The same year the CFR was established the Tavistock Institute in London was founded with financial backing from the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, and British Monarchy. Tavistock is a think tank created to influence public opinion and condition minds for world government. Today, Tavistock controls the Aspen Institute which strongly shapes American education through its influence on America’s leading education reformers, specifically the Knowledge Is Power Program (KIPP) network of charter schools and Teach For America.

    With the Council on Foreign Relations and the powerful tax-exempt organizations controlled by the Rockefellers, Carnegies, and other elite families firmly established, the 1930s proved to be a time when humanism and socialism gained widespread support among academic and political circles. During the 1940s and 1950s, the communist and socialist “change agents” had infiltrated our government at the highest levels which enabled them to put the United States on a path to destruction via control of its educational system. This was a time period when several key pieces of humanist and socialist legislation were passed affecting education. It was also a time when several mass mind control organizations stepped up efforts to psychologically enslave the American people into collectivist and humanist thought in order to establish world government. Furthermore, the United Nations was founded in 1945 and the United States became a member of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in 1946. This was extremely damaging to our nation as humanist educational policies from UNESCO were implemented in American schools in the following decades. In 1953, the behavioral psychologists made their lasting mark on education by perfecting the work of Wundt and Dewey. Skinner, Bloom, and others set the stage for the complete indoctrination and conditioning of children inside classrooms by means of operant conditioning, thus allowing for total societal control in the future. Bloom’s Taxonomy is a foundation for education and teacher training all across the country today.

    The last four decades of the 20th Century saw radical changes in education nationwide due to the actions of humanist and socialist change agents who followed in the footsteps of their predecessors of the 1940s and 1950s. Legislation was passed that removed local control of schools and placed control in the hands of the federal government, thus ensuring control of society by elitist social engineers. Federally controlled organizations and programs were created, which ensured the changing of teachers into behavior “molders” using Skinnerian methods instead of teachers who imparted knowledge to children using traditional methods. Additionally, federal workforce training programs were implemented in schools to provide lifelong laborers for corporations in the 21st Century – all in the name of a highly controlled, socialist world government.

    Currently, the education reform debate rages in this country between two seemingly different parties. On one side is the National Education Association and its supporters, and on the other side of the debate is the Knowledge Is Power Program (KIPP) and Teach For America (TFA) representing charter schools. However, the elite socialists and communists control both sides. Bear in mind that the majority of people involved with these two camps are unaware of this truth and are good people who really believe that they are making a difference in the lives of children, but they are being brainwashed and manipulated by their hidden controllers who have propped them up with funding in order to pull their strings from behind the scenes. The powerful tax-exempt foundations and their affiliated think tanks and corporations, are behind it all – and a highly controlled, socialist society under world government is the endgame.

    The National Education Association was compromised several decades ago via the Rothschild and Rockefeller-funded Tavistock Institute. Thousand of teachers and leaders have been run through the brainwashing mill of National Training Laboratories, which is run by Tavistock.

    Of course, the socialists and communists have their grip on the KIPP/TFA side of the dialectic, primarily through the Rockefeller-dominated Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission and the Tavistock-controlled Aspen Institute. The leadership of KIPP and TFA is loaded with members of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. In addition, many of the KIPP and TFA leaders are undergoing collectivist brainwashing at the Aspen Institute. Furthermore, KIPP’s biggest donors have strong ties to the Council on Foreign Relations, UNESCO, and the Aspen Institute.

    Again, the same manipulative tax-exempt foundations and their affiliated think tanks and corporations are behind the intentional destruction of education as well as its reform. The ultimate goal, or synthesis, is a world government with a dumbed down global workforce, ready and willing to serve their corporate masters. The real reason behind the creation of “choice” through the charter school movement was to open the door to corporate influence. The United States is now seeing the early stages of a corporate takeover of education.

    Ultimate control of American education can be traced back to the British Empire working through British Freemasonry. The Rhodes-Milner Round Table was founded by British Freemasons with the backing of the Rothschild banking dynasty. Cecil Rhodes of the Round Table was an admitted racist and wrote in his will that he desired for the United States to be brought back under the control of the British Empire and for the British Empire to rule the world. Rhodes stated in his final will that he wanted to establish a scholarship program for students to be indoctrinated into British Imperialism in order to carry out his plan for British domination of the world. Rhodes Scholars have infiltrated our educational system and government at the highest levels. From the Round Table originated the Royal Institute for International Affairs and its sister organization in America, the Council on Foreign Relations. The Trilateral Commission was founded by David Rockefeller as a sister organization to the CFR. The British-Rothschild alliance also gave birth to the Tavistock Institute in London, which controls the Aspen Institute in the United States.

    Lastly, the financiers and controllers of American education are intimately connected to the racist Eugenics movement and depopulation agenda. Both the Carnegies and Rockefeller families have funded Eugenics research in America. The Rockefellers supported the Eugenics research of the Nazis and founded the Population Council in 1952. Educational financier, Bill Gates, gives millions to UNESCO and KIPP as well as the Eugenics front organization, Planned Parenthood.

    The humanist elite who are destroying education in this country are suffering from mental illness. They believe that through science they are going to perfect human nature, or become God, and that they are going to create two separate species from human beings. One is to be the slave class and the other is to be the perfect human. They are trying to create a society that will progress into absolute tyranny – total world government in the hands of the few at the expense of the many. Only a well-informed public can stop these people dead in their tracks.

    Breakdown of morality 

    The Breakdown of Moral Discipline In America

    Written By tessler. On Jan 28. In Politics 

    Every society needs a moral code to guide it and to give it a sense of direction and a sense of purpose. No one moral code is necessarily superior to any other and so the Constitution forbidding the establishment of any one religion is a correct construct. The assertion that “morality cannot be legislated” is pure hogwash. Nearly all of our laws are based upon some concept of morality whether it be a state law forbidding murder or a federal law requiring taxation of its people in order for that government to provide the necessities that such governments must provide to its people. 

    It is a farce to believe that morality cannot be an inherent part of any law. The opposite is true. Morality is an inherent part of any law. The moral basis of that law may be wrong, such as the moral basis of Obamacare, but that is where the concept of passing laws “for the common good” comes into play. The question often times becomes how much of the “common good” should be legislated? If it extends to far, it becomes socialistic. If it doesn’t extend far enough, then the governed society can be undisciplined with no direction, focus or a moral compass. 

    It almost goes without saying that the moral discipline in America is at an all time low. 

    One watch of almost any show on television, a medium that is supposed to pass for entertainment, clearly reflects a society that has come to view moral restraint as an ancient and old fashioned concept. Restraint in the use of drugs, in sex and in our choice of words hardly exists any more. 

    “In a republican form of government, which the Constitution guarantees for the United States, elected officials are meant to set social policy for the country. They do so by embodying their view of America’s moral choices in law. (This is a particularly crucial manner for propagating morality in our republic because the Constitution rightly forbids the establishment of religion, the other major social vehicle for advancing morality across society.) In reality, legislatures discharge their moral mandates all the time, and not just in controversial areas such as abortion, gay rights, pornography, and the like.” – How legalizing gay marriage undermines society’s morals 

    Does Morality In America Still Exist? 

    In his 1963 book, The Naked Communist, best selling author Cleon Skousen lists 45 different goals that the Communists have in terms of taking over, or weakening, America. Today we call these same folks socialists since, supposedly, Communism is “dead.” Socialism is but a lesser extreme of communism. If there was any year in the history of modern America in which we can pinpoint the beginning of the end of morality in the United States, it was 1963. 

    “On June 17, 1963 the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that any Bible reciting or prayer, in public schools, was deemed unconstitutional. While American’s have endured great prosperity over the past 40 years we have also lost our moral compass and direction. In reviewing the research, data supports 1963 as a focal point, demonstrating a downward slope in our moral and social decline through 2001. – 

     The Communist Takeover Of America – 45 Declared Goals 

    Let us be clear that there are differences between Socialism and Communism. Let us also be more clear that the goals and objectives of each form of political thinking has nearly the exact same goals and paths to “fundamentally transform” the United States. The political objectives of both of these ways of thinking is very simple: to fundamentally change America from a Constitutional Republic to a more Europeanized version of socialism. 

    “Socialism is commonly regarded as an economic system that seeks to achieve equality among members of society. Communism, on the other hand, is both an economic system that seeks equality among members of society and a political ideology that advocates a classless and stateless society and rejects religion. It is regarded as a more extreme form of socialism.” – Socialism vs Communism

    While all 45 of the goals of the socialists and communists address, in one form or another, basic moral underpinnings of the United States, 5 are especially critical when talking about the moral tone and demeanor of this great nation. Those five goals are: 

    Goal #24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press. 

    Goal #25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. 

    Goal #26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.” 

    Goal #27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.” 

    Goal #28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.” 

    Typical of socialists and communists, each of these goals appears on its surface to have a nice sounding reason for taking the liberal position. But underneath, below the surface, the real goal is, always has been, and always will be the disintegration of the United States as we know it. 

    Goal #24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press. 

    Who is in favor of censorship? No one. The very thought of it brings up Nazi like images of the SS confiscating books and pictures or of the Communists arresting you for making a statement that is mildly critical of the state. In a political context, no one wants, nor likes censorship of speech, thought or censorship of the press.

    But what of moral censorship? By lumping all obscenity laws into the political context of free speech, the socialists have succeeded in confusing folks on the differences between the two. While it is a forgone conclusion that no one may censor my opinion on the government, it has become politically correct to forbid anyone from criticizing Islam or Muslims, or creating parodies of them. But, if Christianity is the subject of the discussion, then “free speech” allows anyone with enough vitriol in their pen to write whatever they want. 

    And this fits very nicely into their next goal of breaking down cultural standards. 

    Goal #25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

    “The problem for many of our young people today is that they are unaware of what is considered indecent because they were never taught the basic fundamentals of good conduct by their parents. In fact, were you to ask those in their 20’s and early 30’s to define the words, vulgarity, obscenity, and swearing, I am confident that many would not know the differences.

    “And, because of political correctness, teachers are often unwilling to correct the students. An advocate of free speech, I am, however, saddened as well as incensed that our lack of decency has resulted in any and all vulgarities, obscenities, and common swear words now being considered the norm.” – 

    The Use Of Vulgarities, Obscenities & Swearing In Public Speaking 

    Now I know that my Libertarian friends have a strong issue about this. Generally speaking, Libertarians are opposed to almost any form of censorship, even if it means expletives are repeated many times in a public broadcast.

    But good taste; good manners; correct English and the avoidance of boorish words cannot ever be replaced. Basic human decency requires that we respect ourselves and the people to whom we are speaking with by not using grotesque words and phrases that offend moral values. By promoting pornography and obscenity in publications, photos and the media, then we’re essentially telling folks that the lack of such respectful restraint in the use of such immoral images and pictures is OK. 

    Goal #24 and Goal #25 are all about the breakdown of moral discipline in our country. By continuously using the most disrespectful, disgusting and derogatory language possible in public and in the media, then that signals to the listener, and to society as a whole, that it is OK to use such language; to not be restrained by good manners or a moral code and ultimately this undermines the discipline of our speech in society and undermines the core moral values we must have in order not to approve such behavior. 

    Goal #26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.” 

    It has been 15 years since the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) law was passed. It states that the federal definition of marriage is between one man and one woman. 

    “In the 15 years since the passage of DOMA, the culture has drastically changed. In 1996 Congress passed the bill with an overwhelming majority and then-President Bill Clinton is even quoted as saying, ‘I remain opposed to same-sex marriage. I believe marriage is an institution for the union of a man and a woman. This has been my long-standing position, and it is not being reviewed or reconsidered.’ In 2009, when asked to restate his position, Clinton said, ‘I personally support people doing what they want to do. I think it’s wrong for someone to stop someone else from doing that.’ When reading the two quotes, it is impossible to miss the drastic shift in thinking. This is perfectly in line with Paul’s words at the end of Romans 1: ‘They not only do [sinful acts] but give approval to those who practice them.’” – 

    Defense of Marriage Act in Trouble? 

    Today, in America, what was once considered taboo has now become the norm. We’re no longer shocked and disgusted by the antics of a singer called Madonna. She has become blase, old stuff and yesterday’s news. Now, forging ahead with a cold, calculating and media contrived image, Lady Gaga has hit the scene. Her antics, her demeanor, her dress and her speech would have shocked millions of decent Americans 2 generations ago. Today, she is the norm. And her disgusting, pitiful and morally bankrupt presentations have become almost an expected norm. That is sad. 

    This is the kind of stuff that clearly demonstrates what was once socially and morally unacceptable, has become the norm. A public lap dance, at half time, in the middle of the playing field, to be seen by the thousands of fans at a professional Lacrosse game. 

    Evidence Of The Moral Decay Of America 

    What has happened since 1963, the year the Supreme Court banned prayers in schools, is that our students no longer had a moral reminder, a moral compass, of what their lives should be like on a daily basis. Banning prayers in schools was tantamount to telling our students to forget about morals, ethics or other restraints in conducting daily life. Now, nearly 3 generations have grown up without prayer in schools; religious attendance in churches has seriously declined and the practice of one’s religion has become an afterthought.

    Which brings us to the next goal. 

    Goal #27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.” 

    It is called “secular humanism.” And it is the most rampant and most dangerous kind of thinking that can exist in our country today. Last month I did an extensive blog post entitled “Secular Humanists: Enemies of The Constitution in which I made it very clear that Secular humanists maintain that they have “adopted the term ‘secular humanism’ to describe their non-religious life stance.” And to that end, secular humanists openly admit that they oppose all organized religions by further declaring that “…secular humanism is at odds with faith-based religious systems on many issues, it is dedicated to the fulfillment of the individual and humankind in general.” – 

    What Is The Origin of Secular Humanism? 

    “So as it stands, both Republicans and Democrats realize America is lacking a strong moral compass. Millions of American parents are trying hard to teach their children good values, but are besieged by the terrible influences beyond the home. The secularists have succeeded in drastically changing the moral tone in this country. And 80 percent of us see that change as a bad thing.” – 

     Goal #28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.” 


    The words of two widely separated individuals, … columnist Cal Thomas and the former Egyptian president Anwar Sadat, strike at the heart of the matter. Thomas writes, ‘When a building’s foundation is in disrepair, it must be replaced. This will take a change of heart and mind that requires different behavior and lifestyle choices. No politician can legislate that.’ Sadat wrote in his autobiography, ‘He who cannot change the very fabric of his thought will never be able to change reality.’ The most vital key to ultimately creating a truly reformed culture is the change that will have to occur within the ‘very fabric’ of people’s thoughts.” – Legislating Morality 


    But we know from reading Revelation that the Beast power – International Jewry – will rule the world, at least for a short period of time, and severely persecute those who “keep the commandments of God and have the faith of Jesus.” 

    There is no “taking America back” because the only One who can fight Satan’s stronghold in America and the world - the power of International Jewry - is Jesus Christ – when He returns to take the righteous to heaven. 

    Our job is to learn to Know the Lord and to Trust Him with everything in our life, and to share His Good News of Salvation – eventually - for all those He has created.